Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of Fiji |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL CASE NO: HAC0021 OF 2004S
STATE
v.
JONA SAUKILAGI
Counsel: Mr Daniel Goundar for the State
Accused in Person
Hearing: 24th, 25th & 26th January 2005
Judgment: 26th January 2005
JUDGMENT
The Assessors are unanimous that the Accused is guilty on Counts 4 to 12 but the majority say on Counts 1 that he is not guilty, and on Counts 2 and 3 that he is guilty.
I agree with them on Counts 4 to 12 and convict him accordingly. On Count 1, I agree with the minority view that he is guilty of larceny on the basis that he knew when he checked his balance on 4th June that the money could not be his and that he withdrew the cash fraudulently and with intent to permanently deprive and without an honest claim of right. I do not accept his story that he believed the money came from his brother. On Counts 2 and 3, I agree with the majority and convict him accordingly.
The Accused is convicted on all counts.
Nazhat Shameem
JUDGE
At Suva
26th January 2005
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2005/12.html