Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of Fiji |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
Criminal Case No: HAC0001 of 2005S
STATE
v.
RUSILA VUKI; and
SUSANA WATI SIVO
Judgment: 4th August 2005
Counsel: Mr. P. Bulamainaivalu for State
Ms B. Malimali for Accused persons
JUDGMENT
The three assessors are unanimous as to the guilt of the 1st Accused of murder. I have directed myself in accordance with my summing up and I agree with them. I am satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the fight at the water pipe occurred not as the accused described it but as the prosecution witnesses Monika and Rosa Tawake described it. I disregard the evidence of Paula Navunisaravi. I am satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the 1st Accused acted unlawfully and not in self-defence, and that she acted with malice aforethought and caused the death of Siteri Momoivalu. I convict her accordingly.
In relation to the 2nd Accused the assessors are unanimous as to her innocence. Their opinions are possible on the evidence on the basis that she shared no common intention with the 1st Accused to do anything unlawful, or that she did not contemplate that anyone would be hurt in the fight. Either of these findings is possible on the 2nd Accused’s evidence. I agree with the assessors and find her not guilty on the basis that the 2nd Accused was not in a joint unlawful enterprise with the 1st Accused. I acquit her accordingly.
Nazhat Shameem
JUDGE
At Suva
4th August 2005
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2005/210.html