PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Fiji

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Fiji >> 2013 >> [2013] FJHC 719

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


State v Laganikoro [2013] FJHC 719; HAC014.2013 (30 July 2013)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT LAUTOKA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION


CRIMINAL CASE NO.: HAC 014 OF 2013


STATE


v


1. JALE LAGANIKORO
2. KOLAIA BUCALEVU


Counsels : Mr. F Lacanivalu for the State
Both Accused in Person


Date of Trial : 22 July – 26 July 2013
Date of Sentence : 30 July 2013
(Name of the Victim suppressed. He is referred to as IN)


SENTENCE


  1. The two accused are before the Court for sentence, after being convicted of the following charges.

First Count


Statement of offence

RAPE: Contrary to Section 207 (1) and (2) (a) of the Crimes Decree No. 44 of 2009.


Particulars of Offence

KOLAIA BUCALEVU on the 15TH day of November 2010, at Nadi, in the Western Division, penetrated the anus of IN with his penis, without the consent of the said IN.


Second Count

Statement of offence

RAPE: Contrary to Section 207 (1) and (2) (a) of the Crimes Decree No. 44 of 2009.


Particulars of Offence

JALE LAGANIKORO on the 15TH day of November 2010, at Nadi, in the Western Division, penetrated the anus of IN with his penis, without the consent of the said IN.


  1. You both pleaded not guilty to above charges. Following trial lasting five days in this Court you were found guilty on above counts against you.
  2. After considering the unanimous verdict of Guilty of the assessors and having reviewed the evidence and summing up in this trial the Court decided to concur with the verdict of the assessors and found you guilty of the above charges.
  3. Thus KOLAIA BUCALEVU you stand convicted for the charge of rape contrary to Section 207 (1) and (2) (a) of the Crimes Decree No. 44 of 2009. JALE LAGANIKORO you too stand convicted for the charge of rape contrary to Section 207 (1) and (2) (a) of the Crimes Decree No. 44 of 2009.
  4. The following facts were proven in evidence during the trial. The 21 year old victim IN was physically and sexually abused by both of you on 11th November 2010 after you had some Beer with the victim and others. From the evidence it is clear that you forced him to suck each one of your penis and also penetrated his anus with your penis. You both have assaulted the victim resulting in several bruises on the back side of the body.
  5. You had no remorse for your above conduct during the trial.
  6. According to the Crimes Decree the maximum punishment for rape is Imprisonment for life. It is a serious offence. The tariff for rape is well settled since the Judgment of then A.H.C.T. Gates J in State v Marawa. [2004] FJHC 338; HAC 0016T.2003S (23 April 2004) The starting point of a rape of an adult is 7 years. The tariff is 7 years to 15 years.
  7. In Mohamed Kasim v The State (unreported) Fiji Court of Appeal Cr. Case No. 14 of 1993; 27 May 1994, The Court of Appeal observed

"We consider that at any rape case without aggravating or mitigating features the starting point for sentencing an adult should be a term of imprisonment of seven years. It must be recognized by the Courts that the crime of rape has become altogether too frequent and that the sentences imposed by the Courts for that crime must more nearly reflect the understandable public outrage. We must stress, however, that the particular circumstances of a case will mean that there are cases where the proper sentence may be substantially higher or substantially lower than that starting point."


  1. Considering the above I commence your sentence at 7 years imprisonment.
  2. Aggravating factors;

Considering all I increase your sentence by 3 years now the sentence is 10 years imprisonment.


  1. Mitigating circumstances of the 1st accused are,

Considering all I reduce 3 years from your sentence now your sentence is 7 years imprisonment.


  1. Mitigating circumstances of the 2nd accused are,

Considering all I reduce 3 years from your sentence, now your sentence is 7 years imprisonment.


  1. Considering Section 18 (1) of the Sentencing and Penalties Decree I impose 5 years as non parole period.
  2. Each one of you is sentenced to 7 years imprisonment. You will not be eligible for parole until you complete serving 5 years of imprisonment.
  3. 30 days to appeal to Court of Appeal.

Sudharshana De Silva
JUDGE


AT LAUTOKA
30 July 2013


Solicitors for the State: Office of the Director of Public Prosecution, Lautoka
Solicitors for the Accused: Both in Person



PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2013/719.html