![]() |
Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of Fiji |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT LAUTOKA
[CRIMINAL JURISDICTION]
High Court Criminal Case No. HAC 137 of 2015
BETWEEN
STATE
AND
DAYA PRASAD
Counsel : Ms Naibe for the State
Ms S. Khan and Mr Z. Khan for the Accused
Dates of Hearing : 25 and 26 March 2019
Closing Speeches : 26 March 2019
Date of Summing up: 28 March 2019
Date of Judgment : 08 April 2019
Date of Sentence : 18 April 2019
SENTENCE
Count 1 – Indecent assault
In August 2014 during the second term school holidays the victim was learning to drive from you. When she was learning to drive you started touching her thighs over her cloths while driving. You squeezed her breasts. The victim didn’t like it, but you told her not to tell anyone about it. The victim reported the incident to her mother. But her mother did not believe her saying that you were part of the family.
Count 2 – Rape
On 27 September 2014 the victim was told by her mother to deliver some food to your place. The victim didn’t want to go, but her mother forced her to go. When the victim brought the food, you asked her to come inside the house. You locked the grill door and forced her to your room. You forcefully took off her clothes. You pushed her on the bed and got on top of her. You tried to kiss her, but the victim started moving her head. The victim kept on shouting, but no one could hear her as there was loud music played at your house. You separated her legs with your legs while holding her hands tightly. You inserted your penis into her vagina. The victim didn’t like it. She called for help by shouting, but no one could hear her. She was shocked, and she didn’t know for how long you did it. The victim said that she did not expect that from her uncle.
Count 3 – Rape
On 10 October 2014 the victim went to your place with her mother to make some sweets. Her mother had to go back home leaving the victim at your place as her mother needed something. You then locked the grill and grabbed her to the sitting room. You played a sex movie and told her to watch it. You held her tight and forced her to watch the movie. You then grabbed her to your room. You took off her clothes and your clothes. You then placed your mouth on her vagina. You were holding her hands and she shouted for help. No one could hear her as the music was loud. You then inserted your penis into her vagina. The victim didn’t like it. It was painful for her. She tried to push you and she bit your arm. You threatened her not to tell the incident to anyone.
Count 4 – Rape
On 18 October 2014 the victim was asked by her parents to go with you to Sigatoka to deliver some sweets. When you were returning in the night you stopped the vehicle on the way. You took a torch and checked around. You asked her to come to the back of the van. When the victim refused you grabbed her. You tried to kiss her, and she kept on moving her head. She didn’t like it. You took off her clothes. You inserted your penis into her vagina. She tried to push you, but you over powered her. You held her tight. The victim tried to shout but there was no one around.
Count 5 – Indecent assault
On 20 November 2014 the victim was told by her mother to go with you and exchange a packet of milk. On your way back, you parked your vehicle for the victim’s sister to come and pick her up. While waiting in the vehicle you came and started touching her. You touched her thighs and breasts. You held her hands when she tried to stop you. The victim didn’t like it and you continued to touch her thighs and breasts until her sister came.
“The tariff previously set in Raj v The State60;[2014] FJSC 1JSC 12 CAV0003.220thp> August 2014uld now be betwebetween 11-20 years imprisonment. Much will depend upon the aggravating and mitigating circumstanconsiions morse, earlyearly pleas, and finally time spent on remn remand awaiting trial for the final sent sentence outcome. The increased tariff represents the denunciation of the courts in the strongest terms.”
“If an offender is convicted of more than one offence founded on the same facts, or which form a series of offences of the same or a similar character, the court may impose an aggregate sentence of imprisonment in respect of those offences that does not exceed the total effective period of imprisonment that could be imposed if the court had imposed a separate term of imprisonment for each of them.”
“The Supreme Court has favoured the approach to granting the discount to be that the remand time is to be dealt with last. Once the term and non-parole period is arrived at, then the court will set out a suitable discount.”
You have 30 days to appeal to the Court of Appeal.
Rangajeeva Wimalasena
Acting Judge
Solicitors
Solicitors for the State : Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions
Solicitors for the Accused: Messrs Iqbal Khan & Associates
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2019/422.html