IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
(WESTERN DIVISION) AT LAUTOKA
CIVIL JURISDICTION

CIVIL ACTION NO. HBC 85 OF 2022

BETWEEN 		:	KING ANWAR HUSSAIN of Lot 12, Drift Road, Level 3 Office 4.
		PLAINTIFF

A N D		:	CO OPTED COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF THE FANTASY ISLAND LESSES
									1ST DEFENDANT

A N D	:	ABBAS ALI Managing Director of Juxta Beach Fiji Pte Ltd, Fantasy Island, Nadi, Businessman
									2ND DEFENDANT

A N D		:	HOME FINANCE COMPANY PTE LIMITED TRADING AS HFC BANK
									3RD DEFENDANT
	
BEFORE 		:	Hon. Mr. Justice Mohamed Mackie

APPEARANCES	:	Mr. Prakashan, for the Plaintiff.
Mr. A. K. Narayan, (senior) for the 2nd Defendant.
Ms. Tumalevu, O/I for the 3rd Defendant.

DATE OF HEARING	: 	26th August 2022.

DATE OF DECISION	:  	26th August 2022.
	
JUDGMENT.

1.	This is an action commenced by the Plaintiff, by his writ of Summons and the Statement of claim dated and filed on 25th March 2022, against the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants, seeking reliefs as prayed for in the prayer thereto.
 
2.	The Plaintiff ,  also by his Ex-parte- Summons dated and filed on 08th April 2022 , moved  for certain injunctive reliefs as per paragraphs (a) to (d) thereof and the court, having heard the Counsel for the Plaintiff, on the same day granted injunctive relief as prayed for in paragraph (a) to the Summons.

3.	The 2nd Defendant, after filing his acknowledgment of service on 1st April 2022, filed his Summons to Strike out supported by his Affidavit sworn on 6th April 2022 pursuant to Order 18 Rule 18 of the High Court Rule 1988. 

4.	The 2nd Defendant also filed his Statement of Defense on 20th April 2022 and an Affidavit sworn by him on 31st May 2022 opposing the injunction Application by the Plaintiff.

5.	In the meantime, the 3rd Defendant too, having filed its acknowledgment of service on 12th April 2022, filed its Statement of Defence on 13th May 2022.

6.	The Court on 22nd April 2002, having decided to go into the Striking Out Application made by the 2nd Defendant first,  fixed the hearing of the same and when the matter came up for hearing on  26th August 2022, learned Counsel for the 2nd Defendant brought to the notice of Court that the parties have arrived at a settlement to dispose the entire matter and tendered the written terms of Settlement signed by their respective solicitors, which was confirmed by the learned counsel for the Plaintiff and the 3rd Defendant as well. 

7.	The said terms of settlement is reproduced below ;

8.	“On the application by the Summons to Strike Out the Plaintiff’s action by the 2nd Defendant dated 12th April, 2022 coming for hearing on 26th August, 2022 the Plaintiff and the 2nd and 3rd Defendants’ (there being no proper party as the 1st Defendant) have agreed to dispose of the proceedings on the following terms:”  

1. The Plaintiff withdraws the action herein.

2. The orders (including the injunction) granted on an ex-parte application by Plaintiff on 
    8th April, 2022, as subsequently extended, is unconditionally discharged.

3. The plaintiff undertakes that he will not bring any further or future action, suit or 
     proceedings in any form or manner which directly or indirectly seeks to claim any 
    relief or remedy based on the allegations or the subject matter (factual or otherwise) 
    pleaded in his Statement of Claim against any party to the present action or any
   member, officials, executive, servant, agents contractor of the unincorporated 
   association known as the Association of Fantasy Island Lessees. 

4.This Terms of Settlement may be pleaded in bar to any action, suit or proceedings now
    pending or hereafter commenced by the Plaintiff in respect of the matter in 3 above
   against any party to this action or any members, officials, executive, servants, agent 
   and contractor of the unincorporated association known as The Association  Fantasy
   Island Lessees.

5. The action herein is to be struck out/dismissed with no order as to costs.

6. The terms herein are to be entered as an Order of the Court.”

9.	I have carefully gone through the above terms and satisfied that the parties, having understood the contents therein, have through their respective Solicitors voluntarily entered into these terms of settlement and accordingly, I allow the parties to settle the entire dispute once and for all as per the above terms of settlement.

10.	Accordingly, the application for strike out and the substantive action hereof are struck out and dismissed without costs.

11.	Judgment is entered as per the terms of settlement hereof and the parties are ordered to abide by this judgment entered on the aforementioned terms of settlement.

A.M. Mohamed Mackie
Judge

At High Court Lautoka on this 26th Day of August, 2022.

SOLICITORS:
For the Plaintiff:	              M/s . Prakashan & Associates 
For the 2nd Defendant:	M/s. A.K. Lawyers.
For the 3rd Defendant:            M/s. Lajendra Lawyers.