You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
Magistrates Court of Fiji >>
2014 >>
[2014] FJMC 110
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
State v Lal [2014] FJMC 110; Criminal Case 1742.2013 (24 February 2014)
IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
Criminal Case No: - 1742/2013
STATE
V
RAVINESH RONESH LAL
PC Josuha for the Prosecution
Mr. Rawuniwai for the Accused
SENTENCE
- RAVINESH RONESH LAL, you were charged in this Court for two counts of Obtaining Financial Advantage by Deception contrary to section 318 of the Crimes
Decree No 44 of 2009.
- On the hearing date you changed your plea and pleaded guilty for these offences and also admitted the summary of facts presented by
the prosecution.
- According to summary of facts on 26th July 2013 you obtained $200 from one Mohommed Sharfraz on the promise that you would sell a
Samsung Galaxy Phone. Same day you also obtained same amount from one Deepak Somiya based on the promise to sell a Sony TV. You failed
to fulfill both these promises.
- I am satisfied with your plea and convict you both these offences. .
- The maximum penalty for Theft is 10 years imprisonment.
- In State v Atil Sharma [HAC 122 of 2010] his Lordship Justice Madigan has set the tariff for obtaining Financial Advant1ge by Deception between 2 years to 5 yea5 years.
- This court finds no aggravating factors in this case case .
- Mitigating factors are married being the sole bread winner, first offender , seeks forgiveness, remorseful, saved Court's time by pleading guilty
and full restitution .
- In this case I select 03 years as my starting point for both counts and deduct 02 years to reach 01 year imprisonment.
- In State v Raymond Roberts ( HAA0053 of 2003S), Madam Shameem held that
" the principles that emerge from these cases are that a custodial sentence is inevitable where the accused pleaded not guilty and makes
no attempt at genuine restitution. Where there is a plea of guilty, a custodial sentence may still be inevitable where there is a
bad breach of trust, the money stolen is high in value and the accused shows no remorse or attempt at reparation".
- You pleaded guilty and made restitution. Also you have no prior convictions . Based on all these factors I believe you need a second
chance.
- Accordingly for both these offences your final sentence stands at 01 year and this is suspended for 02 years.
- If you commit any offence punishable by prison sentence during the next 02 years you can be charged under section 28 of the Sentencing
and Penalties Decree.
- 28 days to appeal
25th February 2014
H.S.P.Somaratne
Resident Magistrate, Suva
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJMC/2014/110.html