You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
Magistrates Court of Fiji >>
2016 >>
[2016] FJMC 103
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
State v Wasele [2016] FJMC 103; Criminal Case 05.2016 (1 August 2016)
IN THE MAGISTRATES’ COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
Criminal Case No: - 05/2016
STATE
V
KAMOE HAE WASELE
For the Prosecution: Cpl Shaw
The Accused: In person
Date of Sentence : 01st August 2016
SENTENCE
- KAMOE HAE WASELE, you were charged with one count of Criminal Intimidation contrary to section 375(1) (a) (IV) 2(a) of the Crimes Decree and one
count of Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm contrary to section 275 of the Crimes Decree.
- According to admitted summary of facts, these incidents happened in Rotuma . The victim is your wife and on 18/07/2016 when she came
home from Oinafa wharf you picked a rice cooker filled with rice and threatened to throw it to her and told her to get out of the
house before you would kill her. You also told her to remove the wedding ring or you will chop her fingers and her neck. The victim
left the house and when she came back home on 20/07/2016 to collect her things you grabbed her by collar and punched her right cheek
resulting injuries as per medical report.
- I am satisfied that your plea was voluntarily and unequivocal. Accordingly I convict you for these offences.
- The maximum penalty for Criminal Intimidation is 10 years imprisonment.
- In State V Baleinabodou[2012]FJHC 981 his Lordship Justice Temo said that an accepted tariff would be from 12 months to 04 years for this offence.
- The maximum penalty for Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm is 05 years imprisonment.
- In State v Tugalala [2008] FJHC 78; HAC025S.2008S (29 April 2008) her Ladyship justice Shameem said :
“The tariff for this offence appears to range from an absolute or conditional discharge to 12 months imprisonment.”
- As for the starting point the UK Sentencing Guidelines states that offences committed in domestic context should be regarded as being
no less serious than offences committed in a non-domestic context. Therefore the starting point should be same irrespective of whether
the parties are known to each other.
- In Laisiasa Koroivuki v the State ( Criminal Appeal AAU 0018 of 2010)the Fiji Court of Appeal discussed the guiding principles for determining the starting point in sentencing and observed :
"In selecting a starting point, the court must have regard to an objective seriousness of the offence. No reference should be made
to the mitigating and aggravating factors at this time. As a matter of good practice, the starting point should be picked from the
lower or middle range of the tariff. After adjusting for the mitigating and aggravating factors, the final term should fall within
the tariff. If the final term falls either below or higher than the tariff, then the sentencing court should provide reasons why
the sentence is outside the range".
- Considering the gravity of offending and your culpability, I select 12 months as the starting point for Criminal Intimidation which
is the base sentence.
- In UK Guidelines following are considered as aggravating factors in domestic violence cases :
- Abuse of trust and abuse of power ;
- Victim is particularly vulnerable ;
- Impact on children;
- Using contact arrangements with a child to instigate an offence ;
- A proven history of violence or threats by the offender in a domestic setting;
- history of disobedience to court orders;
- Victim forced to leave home .
- When sentencing for a domestic violence a court in Fiji can consider the above aggravating factors and any other factors that would
further aggravate the offence.
- Section 4(3) of the Sentencing and Penalties Decree has to consider also by a sentencing court in a domestic violence offence.
- In this case I consider the following as aggravating factors :
- Abuse of trust and abuse of power;
- The victim had to leave the home ;
- This is a domestic violence offence.
- For these aggravating factors I add 10 months to reach 22 months imprisonment.
- In UK Sentencing Guidelines the positive good character and provocation are considered as mitigating factors.
- In this case the you submitted following as mitigating factors:
- Remorseful;
- Promise not to re-offend.
- Further the Prosecution submitted that you have no previous convictions. But it was also shown that you are a former police officer
and in my view lack of convictions would be more to do with your job than other reasons. Be that as it may, I consider that also
as mitigating factor and deduct 04 months to reach 18 months imprisonment.
- In Naikelekevesi v The State Criminal Appeal No AAU 0061 of 2007 it was observed :
“...where there is a guilty plea , this should be discounted for separately from the mitigating factors in a case”.
- In UK Guilty Plea guidelines of 2007 it has been held that when an accused pleaded guilty at the first available opportunity the reduction
is 1/3 and after a trial date is set 1/4 recommended. But when an accused pleaded guilty at the door of the court or after the trial
has started he maybe entitle for only 1/10 discount.
- You pleaded guilty on the first available opportunity and for that following the above guidelines; I deduct 1/3 to reach 12 months
imprisonment.
- Considering all the circumstances, I sentence you to 08 months imprisonment for the Assault causing actual bodily harm and as this
was committed in same transaction made this concurrent to the Criminal Intimidation.
- Now I have to consider whether to suspend this sentence. You were a former Assistant Superintendent of Fiji Police Force and would
be well aware about the seriousness of these offences. Further by committing these offences you breached the trust placed by your
wife on you. Your behavior needs to be denounced in the strongest manner and message need to be given to the public also that domestic
violence is not acceptable in a civilized society. Hence a custodial sentence is warranted even with your past good behavior and
early guilty plea.
- KAMOE HAE WASELE, this Court sentenced you to 12 months imprisonment the offence of Criminal Intimidation and 08 months imprisonment for the offence
of Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm to be served concurrently.
- For the safety of the complainant, I also grant a permanent domestic violence restraining order with standard non-molestation conditions.
- 28 days to appeal.
Shageeth Somaratne
Resident Magistrate
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJMC/2016/103.html