PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Magistrates Court of Fiji

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Magistrates Court of Fiji >> 2016 >> [2016] FJMC 198

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

State v Sailasa - Sentence [2016] FJMC 198; Criminal Case 352.2013 (27 September 2016)

IN THE MAGISTRATES’ COURT

AT NAUSORI

IN THE REPUBLIC OF FIJI ISLANDS

Criminal Case No: 352/13

State

.v.


Joseva Sailasa


Prosecution : PC Abinash (Police Prosecution)
Accused : Present – Mr R Kumar– Legal Aid


Sentence

Introduction

The accused was charged with Indecent Assault, contrary to Section 212 of the Crimes Decree 2009. The Particulars of Alleged Offence is that:

“Joseva Sailasa on the 30th day of June 2013 at Kaba Village, Tailevu in the Central Division unlawfully and indecently assaulted J D.

Following a hearing the accused was found guilty of indecent assault.


Maximum Sentences

The maximum sentences for Indecent Assault as per the Crimes Deis 5 ye 5 years imprisonment.


The Tariff

The tariff for "indecent assault" is a sentence betw to 4 years imprisonment. The more serious the indecent assault,higher wilr will be thbe the sentence: see Ratu Penioni Rakota v The State, Criminal Appeal No. HAA 0068 of 2002S, High Court, Suva; Sikeli Nayate v The State Criminal Appeal No. HAA 46AA 46 of 2008, High Court, Suva.

Justice Shameem giving guidance on the tariff for Indecent Assault cases stated in Rok Stat State (Supra) case:

"..........Sentences for indecent assault ranges 12 moimpr imprisonmesonment to 4 years. The gravity of the offence will determine the starting point for the sentence. The ;indeassau60; of small children reflects on the gravity of the offence. The The naturnature of e of the assault, whether it was penetrative, whether gratuitous violence was used, whether weapons or other implements were used and the length of time over which the assaults were perpetrated, all reflect on the gravity of the offence. Mitigating factors might be the previous good character of the accused, honest attempts to effect apology and reparation to the victim, and a prompt plea of guilty which saves the victim the trauma of giving evidence.

These are the general principles which affect sentencing under Section 154 of the Penal Code. Generally, the sentence will fall within the tariff, although in particularly serious cases, a five year sentence may be appropriate. A non-custodial sentence will only be appropriate in cases where the ages of the victim and the accused are similar, and the assault of a non-penetrative and fleeting type. Because of the vast differences in different types of indecenault , it is diis difficult to refer to any more specific guidelines than these."

Calculation of Sentence

Taking into account that the accused touched the a of ictim this Court ourt takes a starting point of 18 months Iths Imprisonment. For your mitigation this court gives you 6 months discount. This Court takes as aggravating factor the breach of trust of the victim, who was your niece and 16 years old at the time of the offending. This Court increases your sentence by 4 months.

You are sentenced to 16 months imprisonment. This Court finds that the offence you committed was calculated to take advantage of the position you all were sleeping in and easily state that you were touching your wife. When in fact she was not even there. For this reason the Court will not suspend your sentence. The Message must also go out to older and married man like you that custodial sentences will be handed down by the Courts if your prey on young children and not respect and protect them.

You are sentenced to 16 months imprisonment.


28 days to appeal.


Chaitanya Lakshman

Resident Magistrate

27th September 2016



PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJMC/2016/198.html