PacLII [Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Copyright] [Privacy] [Disclaimers] [Help] [Feedback]

Fiji Islands - FLR Volume 8 - Digest & Index

You are here:  PacLII >> Fiji Islands - FLR Volume 8 - Digest & Index


Fiji Islands - FLR Volume 8 - Digest & Index

THE FIJI LAW REPORTS

of cases decided in
THE FIJI COURT OF APPEAL
and
THE SUPREME COURT OF FIJI

1962
Volume 8

This Volume may be cited as “8 FLR”

Editor:
SIR TREVOR GOULD. Kt., LL.M. (N.Z.)
Barrister-at-law, Judge of the Fiji Court of Appeal

Price: $8.00

DIGEST  AND  INDEX

PAGE

ACCOUNT STATED

    See Cause of Action

 

 

 

ACTION

    See also Cause of Action

   Action – compromise – terms of settlement filed in court and action discontinued – fresh action on same issue – incompetent unless compromise first set aside in action brought for that purpose.

    Mohammed Rasul v. Hazara Singh

140

 

 

AFFILIATION

    See Bastardy

 

Appeal

    Civil appeal – evidence and proof – inferences of fact – Court of Appeal substituting own inferences for those of trial judge.

    Southern Pacific Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Subramani

195

    Criminal appeal – ground of appeal isolated passage of summing up taken out of context.

    Chandra Wati v. Reginam

70

    Criminal appeal – reasons of judge for not accepting opinion of assessors – position of Court of Appeal.

    Kanhailal (Joe) Maharaj v. Reginam

3

 

 

ARBITRATION

    Insurance policy – damage by fire – reinstatement in wood not permitted by local authority – award limited to cost of reinstatement in wood – award not bad in law on face of it – Public Health (Building) Regulations 1959 reg. 21 (b) – Rules of the Supreme Court 1883 0.52 r.4.

    Chauhan (D.P.) Bros. V. Yorkshire Insurance Co. Ltd.

169

 

 

BANKRUPTCY

    Act of bankruptcy – fraudulent transfer within s. 3 (1) (b) of Bankruptcy Ordinance (Cap. 37).

    Champaklal Prembhai Mehta v. Official Receiver

184

    Fraudulent preference – bill of sale – onus of proof on trustee – assessment of weight of evidence – conflict between direct and circumstantial evidence – Bankruptcy Ordinance (Cap. 37) ss. 3 (1) (b), 46 (1), 71, 133 (1) (a) – Bankruptcy Act 1914 (4 & 5 Geo. 5, c. 59) s. 1 (1) (b).

    Champaklal Prembhai Mehta v. Official Receiver

184

 

 

BASTARDY

    Evidence and proof – corroboration – evidence amount to – Bastardy Ordinance (Cap. 33) ss.6 (1) – Affiliation Proceedings Act 1957 (5 & 6 Eliz. 2, c.55) s.4 (2).

    David Peter v. Maria Lee

149

 

 

BILL OF SALE

    Construction – whether party joined as guarantor surety or principal debtor – whether liable for moneys owing on separate account by borrower – Indemnity, guarantee and Bailment Ordinance (Cap. 199) s. 13.

    Burns Philp (S.S.) Co. Ltd. v. Elahi Mohammed Hanif

179

 

 

CAUSE OF ACTION

    Account stated – essentials thereof – mutual agreement as to sum due – absolute admission of debt due and payable – admission of part claim coupled with claim of set of insufficient – Rules of the Supreme Court 1883 0.14 r.3.

    Akhil Mines Ltd v. Metal Traders Inc.

34

 

 

CONTRACTS

    See also Moneylending

    Agreement for sale and purchase – deposit – refundable if consent of local authority not given – refusal of consent – conditional consent given after action commenced – interpretation of agreement.

    Yee Ching Dick v. Chandra Prakash Bidesi

52

    Consideration – contract unenforceable for lack of writing – moneys paid thereunder not recoverable on ground of failure of consideration.

    Ram Jeet v. Chotelal

209

    Construction – obligation to pay maintenance – construed as importing obligation to maintain in a reasonable manner having regard to station in life.

    Pragji Sidha v. Dairaj

91

    Construction – supply of films – agreement to come into operation only if existing agreements successfully terminated – meaning of “successfully terminated”.

    Shankarbhai Nagjibhai Patel v. Faniel Sharan

18

    Guarantor – whether on true construction of bill of sale surety or principal debtor – indemnity, Guarantee and Bailment Ordinance (Cap. 199) s. 13.

    Burns Philp (S.S.) Co. Ltd. v. Elahi Mohammed Hanif

179

    Implied term – obligation to maintain – no implication of term that person maintained must reside in family home.

    Pragji Sidha v. Dairaj

91

    Subrogation – payment by insurer – insurer acquires no greater rights by subrogation than those of assured.

    Vueti Viti v. Ross Denney Ltd.

126

    Unenforceable contract – moneys paid thereunder – no basis for finding of implied promise to repay – moneys irrecoverable – Indemnity, Guarantee and Bailment Ordinance (Cap. 199) s. 59 – Statute of Frauds (29 Car. 2, c.3) s.4.

    Ram Jeet v. Chotelal

209

 

 

COURT

    Inherent jurisdiction – previous action on same issue settled and discontinued – stay of proceedings – abuse of court process. 

    Mohammed Rasul v. Hazara Singh

140

 

 

CRIMINAL LAW

Appeal

    See Appeal

 

Assessors

    Reasons of judge for differing from their opinion – reason not approved by Court of Appeal -  duty of Court of Appeal to examine whole of evidence – reasons for differing from assessors must be reflected in the evidence – Penal Code (Cap. 8) s. 242 – Criminal Procedure Code (Cap. 9) s. 306 (2).

    Kanhailal (Joe) Maharaj v. Reginam

3

Charge

    Laid under wrong regulation – not curable on appeal by amendment or by application of the proviso – Criminal Procedure Code (Cap. 9) ss. 123 (a) (ii), 204 (1), 325 (1) – Traffic (Construction and Use) Regulations 1955; regs. 44 (1), 45 (1), 57 – Traffic Ordinance (Cap. 235) s. 2 – Food and Drugs Act 1938 (1 & 2 Geo. 6, c. 56) s. 24 (1) – Food and Drugs Act 1950 (14 Geo. 6, c. 35) s. 9 (1).

    Shiu Govind v. Reginam

214

Confession

    Weight – to be tested in relation to the other proved circumstances

    Chandra Wati v. Reginam

70

Defence

    Automatism – wounding with intent to murder – proper foundation to be laid by defence.

    Ongi Nefelesi v. Reginam

23

Evidence and Proof

    Defence of automatism – necessity for proper foundation to be laid by defence.

    Ongi Nefelesi v. Reginam

23

    Discrepancies and contradictions in evidence of witness – reluctance of Court of appeal to interfere with findings of fact of court of first instance which had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witness.

   Sitiveni Lewanivanua v. Reginam

42

    Onus of proof – facts peculiarly within knowledge of accused – proof of existence of third party insurance policy where owner of vehicle not the driver – Motor Vehicles (Third Party Insurance) Ordinance (Cap. 236) s. 4 (1).

    Rajgopal Pillai v. Reginam

163

    Previous statement by witness inconsistent with his testimony – no credible explanation fir discrepancy – failure of magistrate to consider conflict – Penal Code (Cap. 8) ss. 132 (b), 335 (a), 346 (a), 409 – Criminal Appeal Act 1907 (7 Edw. 7, c. 23) s. 4 (1).

    Jagdishwar Singh v. Reginam

159

    Proof of intent to cause alarm – nature of threat and other relevant circumstances – Penal Code (Cap. 8) s. 359 (a).

    Chinaiya v. Reginam

204

    Sexual offence – evidence of age – birth certificate – need to identify person named in birth certificate as complainant – Penal Code (Cap. 8) s. 147 (1) (a).

    Opetaia Bakewa Tuivuya v. Reginam

249

    Weight of confession – to be tested against other proved circumstances.

    Chandra Wati v. Reginam

70

    Weight of expects evidence – relative competence of judge and assessors to assess.

    Kanhailal (Joe) Maharaj v. Reginam

3

Judgment

    Accused found guilty – no statement by judge that he was convicted – not incurable defect – Larceny Act 1916 (6 & 7 Geo. 5, c. 50) ss. 25 (1)(6), 27 (1) – Criminal Procedure Code (Cap. 4 – Laws of Fiji 1945) ss. 156, 157 – Pacific Order in Council 1893 (Schedule) rr. 101, 102.

    Siru Luluakalo v. Reginam

12

    Neglect by magistrate to include reasons – material on record sufficient for consideration on merits – defect not fatal – Criminal Procedure Code (Cap. 9) s. 155 (10.

    Narottam Kanji Umaria v. Reginam

103

Practice and Procedure

See also Judgment

 

    Absence of accused from trial – jurisdiction – customs Ordinance (Cap. 166) ss. 101, 116 – Criminal Procedure Code (Cap. 9) ss. 155 (1), 184, 191, 196.

    Narottam Kanji Umaria v. Reginam

103

    Adjournment – refusal of reasonable grounds – no application made at appropriate later stage – no application to set aside conviction – Criminal Procedure Code (Cap. 9) s. 196.

    Narottam Kanji Umaria v. Reginam

103

    Bail – refusal by magistrate – application to Supreme Court – desirability of affidavit by prosecution – material required to support allegation defendant likely to interfere with witnesses – Criminal Procedure Code (Cap. 9) s. 109 (3).

    Bechu v. Reginam

240

    Prosecution witness – not declared hostile – cross-examined by prosecutor at stage of re-examination – serious irregularity.

    Binatake Tekai v. Reginam

78

Sentence

    Concurrent or consecutive sentences – principles applicable.

    Krishna v. Reginam

236

    Different sentences imposed by Supreme Court upon persons participating jointly in offence – approach of Court of Appeal – manslaughter – sentence of life imprisonment.

    Sitiveni Lewanivanua v. Reginam

42

    Manslaughter – severe provocation – reduction of sentence.

    Timothy Wakanaba v. Reginam

16

    Taking other untried but admitted offences into consideration – principles applicable.

    Krishna v. Reginam

236

Summing Up

    Ground of appeal – isolated passage should not be taken out of context.

    Chandra Wati v. Reginam

70

Traffic Offences

    Driving motor vehicle without third party insurance – driver person other than owner – onus of proof of existence of valid policy – Motor Vehicles (Third Party Insurance) Ordinance (Cap. 236) s. 4 (1)

    Rajgopal Pillai v,. Reginam

163

    Using motor vehicle without third party insurance – policy in existence – use of vehicle in breach of condition of policy – policy rendered voidable – in force at material time – Motor Vehicle (Insurance) Ordinance (Cap. 236) s. 4 (1) (2) – Motor Vehicles (Third Party Insurance) Ordinance (Cap. 236) ss.9, 10 – Road Traffic Act 1930 (20 & 21 Geo. 5, c. 43) s. 38.

    Ram Prasad v. Reginam

63

Trial

    Assessors having no voice or vote in decision of court – assessors consulted by judge before judgement – fatal flaw in trial – Pacific Order in Council 1893 s. 98.

    Binatake Tekai v. Reginam

78

    Disclosure of previous conviction by newspaper report between trial and judgment – whether miscarriage of justice resulted – Penal Code (Cap.8) s. 300 (a) (ii) – Criminal Evidence Act 1898 (61 & 62 Vict., c. 36) s. 1 (f).

    Chandrika v. Reginam

110

    View by court – absence of accused there from – view part of trial – serious irregularity – Pacific Order in Council 1893.

    Binatake Tekai v. Reginam

78

General

    Bail – matters to be considered in granting or refusing – Criminal

Procedure Code (Cap.9) s. 109 (3) – Arms and Ammunition Ordinance 1961.

    Bechu v. Reginam

240

    Grievous harm – harm that seriously or permanently injures health or is likely so to do – finding of serious interference with health and comfort insufficient – Penal Code (Cap. 8) ss. 4, 253, 271.

    Mohammed Janif v. Reginam

145

    Intimidation – proof of intent to cause alarm – nature of threat and other relevant circumstances – Penal Code (Cap.8) ss.78, 359 (a) – Conspiracy and Protection of Property Act 1875 (38 & 39 Vict., c. 86) s.7 – Indian Penal Code s. 503.

    Chinaiya v. Reginam

204

    Misdirection – witness’ evidence accepted in spite of unexplained conflict with earlier statement – other evidence on record insufficient to establish guilt – miscarriage of justice – Penal Code (Cap.8) ss. 132 (b), 335 (a), 346 (a) 409 – Criminal Appeal Act 1907, (Edw. 7, c. 23) s. 4 (1).

    Jagdishwar Singh v. Reginam

159

    Proviso to section 325 (1) Criminal Procedure Code (Cap.9) – not available to cure conviction on charge laid under wrong regulation.

    Shiu Govind v. Reginam

214

    Selling adulterated food – elastoplasts dressing in curried mutton and taro – Pure Food Ordinance (Cap. 131) ss.4 (a) (i), 5, 7 (2) (a), 7 (3).

    Fong Sing v. Pure Food Inspector

114

    Sexual offence – age of complainant in issue – production of birth certificate – need to identify complainant with person named in certificate – Penal Code (Cap. 8) s.147 (1) (a).

    Opetaia Bakewa Tuivuya v. Reginam

249

 

 

DAMAGES

    Contributory negligence – child carried behind driver of tractor – apportionment of negligence to child to be determined having regard to age and knowledge he might be expected to have of risk.

    Dhapel v. Arjun

74

    Fatal accident – negligent driving – basis of assessment – plaintiff entitled to one fifth of estate of deceased – estate increased by damages awarded under the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Death and Interest) Ordinance (Cap.17) – one fifth of total estate deducted from damages under the Compensation to Relatives Ordinance (Cap. 20).

    Waliamma v. Leylands Limited

49

    Negligent driving – death caused – principles of assessment of damages – Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Death and Interest) Ordinance (Cap. 17) – Compensation to Relatives Ordinance (Cap. 20).

    Basiran v. Harphul Singh

173

 

 

ESTOPPEL

    Res judicata – previous litigation between same parties – judgment in default of appearance – issue which could have been raised, not raised or decided – no estoppel.

   Ramlingham v. Krishna Mission Fiji (Trustees)

121

 

 

EVIDENCE AND PROOF

    See also Criminal Law

    Allegations of fact in statement of claim – taken as established at hearing when order for filing statement of defence not complied with – Magistrates’ Courts Rules (Cap. 5) 0.16 r.3.

    Rasulan v. Sher Ali Khan

1

    Bankruptcy – fraudulent preference – onus of proof – weight of evidence – Bankruptcy Ordinance (Cap. 37) s. 46 (1).

    Champaklal Prembhai Mehta v. Official Receiver

184

    Bastardy proceedings – corroboration – evidence amounting to – Bastardy Ordinance (Cap. 33) s. 6 (1).

    David Peter v. Maria Lee

149

    Inferences of fact – Count of Appeal may in proper case substitute own inferences for those of trial judge.

    Southern Pacific Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Subramani

195

    Questions only relevant as affecting credibility – attack on character of witness – necessity for reasonable grounds for thinking imputation well founded

    Paras Rao Vyas v. Mahalatchmi

229

 

 

EXECUTION

    Garnishee proceedings – attachment of money owing by sheriff to judgment debtor – order absolute opposed on ground insurer entitled to the money so owing by subrogation – insurer in no better position than judgment debtor – money not subject to trust in hands of sheriff.

    Vueti Viti v. Ross Denney Ltd.

121

 Set off – cross judgments – no application or order for set off – whether Writ of Fieri Facias by one judgment creditor for full amount of his judgment irregular.

    Vueti Viti v. Ross Denney Ltd.

121

 

 

EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS

    See also Probate and Administration

    District Administrator – renunciation of administration by next of kin – necessity for writing and delivery to District Administrator – Administration of Estates Ordinance (Cap. 41) ss. 2 (1), 3 (1), (2).

    District Administrator v. Mohammed Sadiq

217

    Limitation – administrator plaintiff in action commenced prior to acquisition of title to administer – action incompetent – amendment unavailable if claim barred by limitation – Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Death and Interest) Ordinance (Cap. 17) – Compensation to Relatives Ordinance (cap. 20) s.8.

    District Administrator v. Mohammed Sadiq

217

 

 

FIERI FACIAS

    See Execution

 

 

 

FOOD

    Adulteration – elastoplast dressing in curried mutton and taro – whether food adulterated – Pure Food Ordinance (Cap. 131) ss. 4, 5, 7.

    Fong Sing v. Pure Food Inspector

114

 

 

GARNISHEE

    See Execution

 

 

 

INCOME TAX

    Capital or income – sale of shares by investment company – whether resulting profits assessable to tax – test to be applied – same test applicable to investment company as to others – Income Tax Ordinance (Cap. 172) s.3.

    Commissioner of Inland Revenue v. C. Roose (Fiji) Ltd.

94

 

 

INSURANCE

    See also Road Traffic

    Claim – accident report form – whether amounting to formal claim.

    Southern Pacific Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Subramani

195

    Claim – condition precedent to liability that no false statement be made in support of claim – whether statement false – whether made in support of claim.

    Southern Pacific Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Subramani

195

    Fire policy – reinstatement in original material not permitted by local authority – insurer not liable for additional cost of reinstatement in approved materials.

   Chauhan (C.P.) Bros v. Yorkshire Insurance Co. Ltd.

169

    Third party policy – motor vehicle – liabilities required to be covered – exemption of liability arising solely by virtue of Workmen’s Compensation Ordinance – exemption limited to liability of policy holder to own employees – Workmen’s compensation Ordinance (Cap. 93) s. 25 – Motor Vehicles (Third Party Insurance) Ordinance (Cap.236) ss. 6 (1) Proviso (i), 11.

    Queensland Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Colonial Sugar Refining Co. Ltd.

59

Interpretation

    See also Contract

    Agreement for sale and purchase – subject to consent of local authority – consent refused but later given conditionally – whether deposit refundable – construction of agreement.

    Yee Ching Dick v. Chandra  Prakash Bidesi

52

    Imperial statute – statute of general application – to be read with verbal alterations not affecting substance – forfeiture Act 1870 (33 & 34 Vict., c. 23) ss. 6, 8, 9 – Supreme Court Ordinance (Cap.4) ss. 35, 37.

    Mohammed Isaac v. Abdul Kadir

152

    Lease – extension – meaning of.

    Kuppammal v. Khan

9

    Magistrates’ Courts Rules 0.13 para. (b) – “may” having a compulsory meaning in first sentence of rule.

    W.L.D. Harvie Ltd. v. Naranji Deoji

117

 

 

LAND

    Lease – power of attorney given by lessee while serving sentence of imprisonment – lessee not a convict within s.8 of Forfeiture Act 1870 – prohibition against alienation of property by that section not applicable – power of attorney and transfer pursuant thereto valid – Forfeiture Act 1870 (33 & 34 Vict., c. 23) ss. 6, 8, 9 – Supreme Court Ordinance (Cap. 4) ss.35, 37 – Criminal Justice Act 1948 (11 & 12) Geo. 6, c. 58) ss.78, 83, 8th Schedule, 10th Schedule Pt. 1 – Penal Code 1944 ss. 24, 415, Schedule 1 – Malicious Damage Act 1861 (24 & 25 Vict., c.97) – Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (24 & 25 Vict., c. 100).

    Mohammed Issac v. Abdul Kadir

152

 

 

LANDLORD AND TENANT

See also Native Land

    Extension of term – period unspecified – “extension” contrasted with “renewal” – construction of clause – right to reasonable extension.

    Kuppammal v. Khan

9

 

 

LIMITATION OF ACTIONS

    See Practice and Procedure

 

 

 

MASTER AND SERVANT

    Implied authority – unauthorised mode of performing authorised act – slander – vicarious liability of master.

    Indarmati v. W. R. Carpenter & Co. (Fiji) Ltd.

46

 

 

MAINTENANCE

    See Contract

 

 

 

MONEYLENDING

    Action settled and discontinued – terms of settlement filed in court – subsequent action on same issue incompetent unless compromise first set aside by action – Moneylenders Ordinance (Cap. 207).

    Mohammed Rasul v. Hazara Singh

140

    Loan made when lender not a moneylender – payment of interest and new repayment date agreed after lender became registered moneylender – transaction not within Ordinance – Moneylenders Ordinance (Cap. 207) s. 16 (1).

    Param Anand Singh v. Jin

176

    Memorandum of contract – existing loan repaid from new loan between same parties – whether term of money lending contract – Moneylenders Ordinance (Cap. 207) s.16 (3) – Bills of Sale Act (1878) Amendment Art 1882 (45 & 46 Vict., c. 43) – Moneylenders Act 1927 (17 & 18 Geo. 5, c. 21).

    Totaram v. Nasiban

29

    Memorandum of moneylending contract – promissory note given as security but counter-signed by moneylender and containing all terms of contract a sufficient memorandum – loan not rendered irrecoverable by later cancellation of promissory note – Moneylenders Ordinance (Cap. 207) s. 16 (1) (4).

    Deo Verma Singh v. Ram Sarup

107

    Moneylender’s account – entries not in proper sequence – entries made at one time shortly before court proceedings – not a regular account – loan irrecoverable – Moneylenders Ordinance (Cap. 207) ss.16, 17, 18.

    Bianath Singh v. Keshonand

83

    Moneylender’s account – whether regular – question of fact in each case – Moneylenders Ordinance (Cap.207) s. 18 (1) – Moneylenders Ordinance (Nigeria) (c.136) s.19.

    Mahajibhai Naghjibhai Patel v. Mahendra Kumar Chhotalal

245

    Pleading–failure to keep regular account–illegal act–court will take cognisance though not pleaded–Moneylenders Ordinance (Cap. 207) s.18–rules of the Supreme Court 1883 0.3 4.10, 0.70 r.1.

    Bianath Singh v. Keshonand

83

 

 

NATIVE LAND

    Lease – consent to transfer – consideration misstated in application to Native Land Trust Board – consent granted – consent not vitiated in absence of withdrawal thereof by Board or declaration by court.

    Mohammed Issac v. Abdul Kadir

152

    Lease – transfer executed – consent of Native Land Trust Board granted but not endorsed on transfer – purported revocation by transferor of lease ineffectual.

    Mohammed Issac v. Abdul Kadir

152

    Leasehold – declaration of trust amounting to licence to occupy and grow crops – dealing in Land – Native Land Trust Ordinance (Cap. 104) s.12.

    Ramlingham v. Krishna Mission Fiji (Trustees)

121

    Membership of tokatoka and mataqali – identity of persons to whom rent of native land to be paid – not questions to be decided by Native Land Trust Board – Register of Native Lands – Native Lands Commission – Native Land Trust Ordinance (Cap. 104) ss.2, 3, 4 (1), 14 (1), 32 – Native Lands Ordinance (Cap. 103) ss. 4, 6, 6 (4), 6A, 7, 8 – rules of the Supreme Court 1883 0.25 r.2 – Native Land (Leases and Licences) Regulations (Cap. 103) reg. 3(1).

    Charlie Ravovo Thomas v. Native Land Trust Board

223

 

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

    Executed by person serving sentence of imprisonment – distinction between penal servitude and imprisonment – prohibition against alienation of property in s.8 of Forfeiture Act 1870 inapplicable – power of attorney valid – Forfeiture Act 1870 (33 & 34 Vict.,  c.23) ss.6, 8, 9 – Supreme Court Ordinance (Cap. 4) ss. 35, 37 – Criminal Justice Act 1948 (11 & 12 Geo. 6, c.58) ss.78, 83, 8th Schedule, 10th Schedule Pt. 1-Penal Code 1944 ss.24, 415, Schedule 1.

    Mohammed Issac v. Abdul Kadir

 

 

 

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

    Amendment – substitution of parties – no amendment after claim barred by limitation – Rules of the Supreme Court 1883 0.16 r.2.

    District Administrator v. Mohammed Sadiq

 

    Pleading – moneylenders – failure to keep regular account- illegal act – not pleaded by defendant – court will take cognisance – Moneylenders Ordinance (Cap. 207) s.18 – Rules of the Supreme Court 1883 0.3 r.10, 0.70 r.1.

    Bianath Singh v. Keshonand

83

    Pleading – order for filing of statement of defence – no defence filed in fact – allegations of fact in statement of claim taken as established – Magistrates” Courts Rules (Cap. 5) 0.16 r.3.

    Rasulan v. Sher Ali Khan

1

    Venue – action in tort in Magistrate’s Court at Suva – defendant carrying on business at Lautoka – special plea in objection to jurisdiction – duty of magistrate – Magistrates’ Courts Rules (Cap.5) 0.13 paras. (b) (c) (d) – Magistrates’ Courts Ordinance (Cap.5) s.33.

    W.L.D. Harvie Ltd. v. Naranji Deoji

117

    Witness – cross-examination – questions affecting credibility by attack on character – necessity for reasonable grounds for thinking imputation well founded.

    Paras Rao Vyas v. Mahalatchmi

229

 

 

PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION

    See also Executors and Administrators

    Probate in solemn form – execution of will – circumstances of suspicion – proof of knowledge and approval by deceased of contents of will.

    Paras Rao Vyas v. Mahalatchmi

229

 

 

REVENUE

    See Income Tax

 

 

 

ROAD TRAFFIC

    See also Damages

    Driving motor vehicle without third party insurance – vehicle driven by person other than owner – onus of proof – Motor Vehicles (Third Party Insurance) Ordinance (Cap. 236) s.4 (1).

    Rajgopal Pillai v. Reginam

163

    Third party insurance – using vehicle for purpose prohibited by policy – policy rendered void able and not void – policy in force at material time – Motor Vehicle (Insurance) Ordinance (Cap. 236) s4 (1) (2) – Motor Vehicles (Third Party Insurance) Ordinance (Cap. 236) ss.9, 10 – Road Traffic Act 1930 (20 & 21 Geo. 5, c.43) s.38.

    Ram Prasad v. Reginam

63

 

 

SALE OF LAND

    See Contract

 

 

 

SUBROGATION

    See Contract

 

 

 

TORT

    See also Damages

    Negligence – child permitted to ride behind driver of tractor – unlawful act – heavy-duty of care on driver – apportionment of negligence – Compensation to Relatives Ordinance (Cap.20) – Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Death and Interest) Ordinance (Cap.17).

    Dhapel v. Arjun

 

74

    Slander – publication – publication to spouse of plaintiff sufficient.

    Indarmati v. W.R. Carpenter & Co. (Fiji) Ltd.

 46

    Slander – vicarious liability – implied authority of employee to speak to person reasonably suspected of shoplifting – use of defamatory words unauthorised – employer liable.

    Indarmati v. W.R. Carpenter & Co. (Fiji) Ltd.

 46

 

 

WORDS AND PHRASES

 

“approval”

58

“consent”

58

“Convict” (Forfeiture Act 1870)

155

“extension”

11

“grievous harm” (Penal Code Cap8) s.4

146

“next of kin” (Administration of Estates Ordinance (Cap.41) s.3 (1))

219

“penal servitude” (Forfeiture Act 1870)

156

“renewal”

11

“successfully terminated”

21

 

 

WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION

    Workman injured by negligent third party – compensated by employer under Workmen’s Compensation Ordinance – action for reimbursement by employer against insurer of third party – liability of insurer not one arising solely by virtue of Workmen’s Compensation Ordinance – included in policy – Workmen’s Compensation Ordinance (Cap.93) s.25 – Motor Vehicles (Third Party Insurance) Ordinance (Cap. 236) ss. 6(1) Proviso (i), 11.

    Queensland Insurance Co. Ltd v. Colonial sugar Refining Co. Ltd

59

 

 


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/indices/cases/FLR_Vol08_Index.html