PacLII [Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Copyright] [Privacy] [Disclaimers] [Help] [Feedback]

Fiji Islands - FLR Volume 20 - Digest & Index

You are here:  PacLII >> Fiji Islands - FLR Volume 20 - Digest & Index


Fiji Islands - FLR Volume 20 - Digest & Index

THE FIJI LAW REPORTS

of cases decided in
THE FIJI COURT OF APPEAL
and
THE SUPREME COURT OF FIJI

1974
VOLUME 20

This Volume may be cited as “20 F.L.R.”

EDITOR:
R.S. FRY, B.A. (Oxen)
Former Chief Registrar of the Supreme Court of Fiji and Fiji Court of Appeal

PRICE :  $20.00g

DIGEST AND INDEX

PAGE

 

 

AGENCY

    Whether ex-employee able to pledge former employer’s credit by fraudulent issue of its official order forms – whether sufficient to set up agency by estoppel.

    J.V. Kapadia & Co. v Suva Motors Ltd.

32

 

 

APPEAL

    Civil appeal – time within which notice of appeal must be lodged – Court of Appeal Rules (Cap.8) r.16.

    Civil appeal – when date of entry of judgment perfected – Supreme Court Rules 1968 rs 4(a) 5, 0.42 r.5 – Supreme Court Rules (Imp.) O.I. r.4  0.59 r.4.

     John Fong v. John T. Polotini & Anor

15

 

 

BAILMENT

    Destruction of goods by fire – burden of proof on bailee to show that he had taken proper and reasonable care of goods whilst in his possession.

    Gogay & Sons v. Girwar Singh & Sons.

55

 

 

BASTARDY

    Evidence – whether mother’s evidence corroborated in a material particular – Maintenance and Affiliation ordinance 1971 s.18(2).

    Vinod Lal v. Ambika Devi

70

 

 

CONTRACT

    Sale of goods to Farmers’ Club – whether officers of that Club liable in a personal capacity for payment.

    Morris Hedstrom v. Kapildeo & Ors

47

 

 

CRIMINAL LAW

    Evidence and Proof

    Duty of magistrate to analyse the evidence – recommended form of judgment – Criminal Procedure Code (Cap.l4) s.154 (1).

    Chandar Pal v. Reginam

1

    Evidence of driving prior to scene of accident – whether irrelevant and prejudicial – Penal Code (Cap.11) s.269.

    Edward Sheikh Faruk Ali v. Reginam

35

    Evidence of expert witnesses to be subject to same scrutiny as lay witnesses.

    Colin Raymond Langford v. Reginam

11

    Submission of no case to answer wrongfully rejected by court – whether conviction will be quashed where subsequent evidence given by defence supplies that which was lacking  on part of prosecution – Criminal Procedure Code (Cap.14) s.275 (1).

        Submission of no case to answer – whether court must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant guilty before finding case to answer – Criminal Procedure Code (Cap.14) s.275 (1).

    Munsamy Chetty v. Reginam

108

    Unsworn statement by defendant at trial – weight to be attached thereto.

    Lenaitasi Vakatora v. Reginam

8

    Witness refreshing memory – value and weight to be placed on evidence.

    Munsamy Chetty v. Reginam

108

Judgment

    Supreme Court – effect of Criminal Procedure Code (Cap.14) s.153, 154, 155, 281 (2).

    Edward Sheikyh Faruk Ali v. Reginam

35

Practice and Procedure

    Charge of robbery with violence – whether charge laid under Penal Code (Cap.11) s.326(1) (b) and s.416 instead of s.417 bad in law.

    Ram Chandra Naidu v. Reginam

63

    Facts material to sentence challenged – magistrate must hear evidence on oath to decide disputed facts.

    Director of Public Prosecutions v. Jolame Pita

5

    Lies told by accused – whether magistrate directed himself properly thereon.

    Ram Chandra Naidu v. Reginam

63

    Notice to attend court – Criminal Procedure Code (Cap.14) s.81(1) – when such notice valid.

    Director of Public Prosecutions v. Bissun Prasad

23

    Whether medical textbooks evidence per se – whether magistrate entitled to have recourse to such textbooks.

    Ganga Ram v. Reginam

19

    Whether medical textbooks evidence per se – whether magistrate entitled to have recourse to such textbooks.

    Colin Raymond Langford v. Reginam

11

    Whether statement of judge concurring with the opinion of the assessors amounts to a decision under Criminal Procedure Code (Cap.14) s.281 (2).

    Babu Ram v. Reginam

97

Principles of Criminal Liability

    Mens rea – whether offence of abandoning litter one of strict liability – Lautoka By-Laws 1972 regs 2, 3, 6, and 7(a).

    Girdhari v. Lautoka Town Council

42

    Robbery with violence – driver of “get away car” – whether party to substantive offence.

    Ram Chandra Naidu v. Reginam

63

Sentence

    Causing death by dangerous driving – whether imprisonment appropriate – length of disqualification.

    Edward Sheikh Faruk Ali v. Rginam

35

    Driving whilst disqualified – Traffic Ordinance (Cap.152) s.30(4) – imprisonment proper sentence unless special circumstances warrant lesser punishment.

    Director of Public Prosecutions v. Bissun Prasad

23

    Increase of sentence on appeal – whether accused afforded opportunity of making submissions against proposed increase.

    Ram Chandra Naidu v. Reginam

63

    Murder – whether court has jurisdiction to interfere with death sentence.

    Cession Lal & Anor v. Reginam

82

    When imposition of suspended sentence justified.

    Director of Public Prosecutions v. Jolame Pita

5

Summing Up

    Provocation – obligation on judge to direct assessors on provocation if evidence present from which provocation may be deduced.

     Self defence – only necessary to direct assessors on issue of self defence if evidence present to support such a plea.

    Cession Lal & Anor v. Reginam

82

Traffic Offences

    Causing death by dangerous driving – Penal Code (Cap. 11) s.269 – whether evidence relating to the manner of driving before accident irrelevant and prejudicial.

    Edward Sheikh Faruk Ali v. Reginam

35

    Causing death by dangerous driving – Penal Code (Cap.11) s.269(1) – driving must be shown to be the real cause of accident – prosecution must show fault on part of driver causing a situation which, viewed objectively, was dangerous.

    Chandar Pal v. Reginam

1

    Dangerous driving – Traffic Ordinance (Cap.152) s.38(1) – whether the fact that driver affected by drink relevant to issues of dangerous driving and severity of sentence.

    Lenaitasi Vakatora v. Reginam

8

    Driving under the influence of drink – Traffic Ordinance (Cap.152) s.39(1) – whether report of doctor properly admitted in evidence.

     Driving under the influence of drink – Traffic Ordinance (Cap.152) s.39(1) – observations by Court of general application to such cases involving medical evidence.

    Ganga Ram v. Reginam

19

    Driving under the influence of drink – Traffic Ordinance (Cap.152) s.39(1) – whether report of doctor and government analyst properly admitted in evidence.

    Colin Raymond Langford v. Reginam

11

 

 

DIVORCE

    Evidence and proof – admissions of adultery by wife – whether obtained by duress – whether privileged – whether corroboration required – standard of proof – Matrimonial Causes Ordinance 1968 ss.70, 94 (1).

    Bhagmati & Anor v. Ishri Prasad

75

 

 

ESTOPPEL

    Whether firm liable to pay for goods obtained by ex-employee through his fraudulent use of its official order forms – whether agency by estoppel established.

    J.V. Kapadia & Co. v. Suva Motors Ltd.

32

 

 

EVIDENCE AND PROOF

    Corroboration – bastardy proceedings – failure of father to give evidence at trial may be taken into account in deciding what weight to give to corroboration.

      Bastardy proceedings – evidence of opportunity – association sufficient to corroborate mother’s evidence.

    Vinod Lal v. Ambika Devi

70

 

 

HUSBAND AND WIFE

    Evidence and proof – connivance – what must be established to prove connivance – presumption against connivance having occurred.

     Separation agreement – whether such agreement void as contrary to public policy.

    Peter Graham Levestam v. Ciwa Philbert Levestam

30

 

 

INTERPRETATION

    Criminal law – Criminal Procedure Code (Cap.14) s. 281 (2) – meaning of decision of the court.

    Babu Ram v. Reginam

97

    Criminal law – litter offence – meaning of abandon – Lautoka By-laws 1972 regs 2, 3, 6 and 7(a).

    Girdhari v. Lautoka Town Council

42

 

 

JUDGMENT

    Recommended form and pattern – Criminal Procedure Code (Cap. 14) s.154 (1).

    Chandra Pal v. Reginam

1

 

 

LAND

    Agreement for sale and purchase – time of the essence – whether such a clause waived by vendor – whether estopped from exercising his right of rescission.

     Agreement for sale rescinded by vendor – whether money paid under such an agreement returnable to purchaser.

    Stanley Charles Burges & Ors v. Ram Prasad

49

    Ejectment – squatters – law relating thereto – Land Transfer Act 1971 s.169.

    Attorney-General v. Hardeo Shandil

93

 

 

LANDLORD AND TENANT

    Covenant to yield up premises in good and tenantable repair – whether such covenant deprived tenant of right to remove fixtures and fittings.

      Trade fixtures and fittings – tenant’s right to remove same after expiration of his lease.

    Douglas James Gowang Garrick v. Vincent Joseph Costello

88

 

 

LAW PRACTITIONERS

    Admission to practise on a temporary basis as barrister and solicitor – complete discretion to admit or refuse such admission vested in Chief Justice personally – Legally Practitioners Ordinance (Cap.228) s.4.

    Re Handley

58

 

 

MASTER AND SERVANT

    Servant driving master’s motor vehicle involved in collision – whether master vicariously liable for servant’s negligence – whether acting outside scope of employment.

    Colonial Mutual Life Assurance v. Attorney-General

102

 

 

NEGLIGENCE

    Action for damages arising from motor vehicle accident – whether owner vicariously liable for driver’s negligence.

    Colonial Mutual Life Assurance v. Attorney-General

102

    Goods destroyed by fire whilst in the custody of carrier – whether reasonable care exercised by carrier during journey.

    Gogay & Sons v. Girwar Singh & Sons

55

 

 

PASSING OFF

    Goodwill or reputation to be protected must be established where action bought.

    ITT Sheraton Corporation of America v. Sheraton Hotels Ltd. & Ors

26

 

 

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

    Application to dismiss action for want of prosecution whether delay on appellant’s part had severely prejudiced the feasibility of a fair trial – Rules of the Supreme Court 1968 0.2 r.2, 0.3 rs.5, 6, 0.19 r.1.

    Studio Glamour v. A.S. Farebrother & Co. Ltd.

120

    Judgment – entry of judgment in Supreme Court Registry – whether practice of entering judgments in Crown proceedings differs from the practice when Crown not involved – Supreme Court Rules 1968 rs.4 (a), 5 0.42 rs. – Supreme Court Rules (Imp.) 0.1 r.4, 0.59 r.4.

 

    Judgment – when date of entry of judgment in civil appeal perfected – Supreme Court Rules 1968 rs.4 (a), 5, 0.42 rs. 5 – Supreme Court Rules (Imp.) 0.1 r.4, 0.59 r.4.

    John Fong v. John T. Polotini & Anor

15

 

 

ROAD TRAFFIC

    See Criminal Law – Traffic Offences

 

 

 

SALE OF GOODS

    Delivery of goods to Farmers’ Club – whether officers of that Club liable in a personal capacity for repayment.

    Morris Hedstrom Ltd. v. Kapildeo & Ors

47

 

 

SOLICITORS

    See Law Practitioners

 

 

 

TORT

    Trespass – whether actionable per se whether nominal damages should be awarded if trespass proved.

    Douglas James Gowang Garrick v. Vincent Joseph Costello

88

 

 

TRADE MARK

    Protects goods and not services – no infringement unless mark used upon and in connection with goods – Trade Marks Ordinance (Cap.212) s.2.

    ITT Sheraton Corporation of America v. Sheraton Hotels Ltd. & Ors.

26


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/indices/cases/FLR_Vol20_Index.html