PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Niue

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Niue >> 2017 >> [2017] NUHC 2

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


In the Matter of Part Fugaluga, Hikutavake [2017] NUHC 2; Application 10703 (6 April 2017)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NIUE
(LAND DIVISION)


App No: 10703/ 10760/ 10925/10988/11329


IN THE MATTER:
Part Fugaluga, Hikutavake -
Determine Title and Appoint Leveki Magafaoa


BETWEEN
Melealope Taniela Gumaka
Hilimatapule Palalagi Mokavesi Jack Willie Lipitoa Dick Hipa Tuhipa
Applicants


Judgment: 6th April 2017


DECISION OF JUDGE WW ISAAC


Introduction


[1] The applications before the Court are to determine the title and appoint a Leveki Magafaoa for Part Fugaluga, Hikutavake.

[3] The provisional plans before the Court are:

Land Name:Pt. Fugaluga/Futapeka BLK II, HIKUTAVAKE SD

Provisional Plan 10988


[4] Since the commencement of the proceedings, the Gumaka and Palalagi families have completed a Memorandum of Agreement dated 4 November 2015 in which they agree to the following:

[5] The matter came before the Court on 26th November 2015 and each party has had the opportunity to put their respective cases to the Court.

Case for Melealope Gumaka and Hilimatapule Palalagi


[6] Melealope Gumaka and Hilimatapule Palalagi claim that Fugaluga was given by Puasifa to their grandfather, Gumaka, around 1940 and Puasifa told her family not to go back on this gifting to Gumaka and his descendants. Hilimatapule Palalagi submits that it can be inferred from this statement that Puasifa did not intend her descendants to take back the land.

[9] Hala Mahani Tafua, another child of Sioufa and Tafua, provided the following evidence by affidavit in support of Hilimatahepule's application. Sioufa and Tafua built a house on the land for themselves in 1960, and another house was built in 1962 for Sioufa's brothers, Taniela and Mataiki. They also built another smaller kitchen unit behind the main house. Siuofa and Tafua's youngest child, Ottorose, passed away in 1968 and was buried in front of the main house. Her headstone is still located there.

[10] Despite the family moving to New Zealand in the early 1970s, Sioufa and Tafua maintained connection to the land. They visited frequently and sent money to the unofficial leveki, Opili Talafasi, who had been appointed over the land to help with maintenance. It was always their intention to return to the land and although Sioufa died in 1999 after a short illness in New Zealand, Tafua returned to the land after her death. Tafua died in the house in 2003. Their last wishes, according to Hilimatapule, were for tht family to maintain the houses and land. The family has now spent thousands of dollars in maintenance since the 1970s, and the grandchildren have now taken over this duty of maintenance.

Case for Mokavesi Jack Willie Lipitoa


[14] Mokavesi Lipitoa claims connection to the land through Puasifa, who adopted Mokavesi 's adopted mother Hinavele Mokahemotu Pamo.

[15] Mokavesi Lipitoa claims that she had always known that, although the land was given to Gumaka and has been occupied by Gumaka and his descendants, it always belonged to Puasifa.

Case for Dick Tuhipa


[19] Dick Tuhipa disputes Mokavesi's claim that the land belongs to Puasifa. He submits that Puasifa did not own any land on the upper terrace of the hill where Fugaluga is located and never lived on Fugaluga. He claims, rather, that she lived down the hill on the lower terrace of Hikutavake village.

Discussion


Determination of Title


[23] The first issue to determine is to determine title by declaring a common ancestor of the magafaoa of this land.

[24] When determining title, I must take into account Section 10 of the Land Act 1969 and ensure that title to the land is determined in accordance with Niue customs and usages.[1] Section 10 further states that ownership is to be determined by ascertaining and declaring the magafaoa of that laud by reference to the common ancestor.[2]

[25] Section 11 Land Act 1969, sets out matters which the Court may take into account when determining title. This includes the genealogical connection to the land, the names and location of any cultivation, villages, burial places and other places of historical significance, and any other proof of occupation.

[26] When considering the evidence, I accept that the land was given by Puasifa to Gumaka. This took place in the 1940's and is clearly in the memory of the families of the donor of the land, Puasifa and the family of the donee Gumaka.

[27] This fact is corroborated by evidence from the Mokavesi applicants and the Gumaka applicants and I do not consider that the evidence of Dick Tuhipa refutes that evidence.

Leveki Magafaoa


[32] In considering the appointment of a Leveki Magafaoa I note the provisions of section 14 which require:

"(5) Any person who is domiciled in Niue, and whom the Court is satisfied is reasonably familiar with the genealogy of the family and the history and locations of Magafaoa land, may be appointed as a Leveki Magafaoa of any land, but if he is not a member of the Magafaoa he shall not by virtue of such appointment acquire any beneficial rights in the land"


[33] I therefore must bear in mind the ownership of the land by the Puasifa family as well as the occupation of this land by the Gumaka family. To enable both the authority and rights of both these families to be recognized I consider I must ensure that both families are represented.

Dated at Fonuakula, Alofi this 06th day of April 2017.


Wilson W Isaac
JUDGE


[1] Land Act 1969, s 10(1)
[2] s12


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/nu/cases/NUHC/2017/2.html