8 TTR 438
LONET ELDRIDGE, Appellant

v.

ELIKEN ELIAM, Appellee

Civil Appeal No. 364

Appellate Division of the High Court

Ponape District

January 25, 1984

Appeal from trial court judgment affirming Land Commission determination of ownership. The Appellate Division of the High Court, Miyamoto, Associate Justice, held that father, as "administrator" of the land for minor child under Ponapean custom, had no authority to grant the land to someone outside of the family, and therefore judgment of the trial court was reversed.
Ponape Land Law-Inheritance
	Under Ponapean custom, father, as "administrator" of land for his minor child, had no authority to grant the land to someone outside the family.
Counsel for Appellant:	MARTIN F. MIX, Trial Assistant,	
	P.O. Box 143, Kolonia, Ponape 96941	
Counsel for Appellee:	BURTON JANO, Trial Assistant,	
	Kolonia, Ponape 96941	
Before MUNSON, Chief Justice, MIYAMOTO, Associate Justice, and HEFNER, Associate Justice
MIYAMOTO, Associate Justice
This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial division affirming the Ponape State Land Commission Determination that Eliken Eliam is the owner of Tract No. 73966, formerly Japanese Lots Nos. 1269 and 1270, being a portion of the land known as Peinpwe, situated in the Pohnauleng section, Madolenihmw Municipality, State of Ponape
The land Peinpwe was originally owned by Alpert and during the German Land Reform Program of 1912, the land was caused to be registered in the name of his grandson, Lonet Eldridge, a male minor child about six years of age, as owner, and also in the name of Lincoln Eldridge, his father, as "administrator" of the land for the minor child. During the Japanese administration, the land was subdivided into five parts by Lincoln Eldridge and his wife Kari, and these individual portions went to their sons, Anton, Lonet and Sakies and to Roland Norman and Eliken Eliam. These lands were subsequently surveyed and registered in the Tochi Daicho by the Japanese administration. No problems arose as a result of this subdivision until the Land Commission began to determine the titles to these lands.
As to Anton's interest in the land, the Land Commission determined his portion to be his and in the subsequent appellate action, the trial division and the appellate division (in Civil Appeal No. 365) affirmed the ruling of the Land Commission.
As to Roland Norman's interest in the land, the trial division, in Roland Norman v. Lonet Eldridge, Civil Action No. 10-73, ruled in favor of Lonet Eldridge, finding, inter alia, that Lonet had established adverse possession over the land registered in Roland Norman's name. There was no appeal. There is no indication in the judgment what Roland Norman's relationship was to the Eldridge family.
This action, third among the five subdivisions, is to determine whether Eliken Eliam, a Mokilese person, a friend of Lincoln Eldridge but not a member of the Eldridge family, could receive the land from Lincoln Eldridge, the administrator of the land under the German deed.
As stated in Civil Appeal No. 365 it is a Ponapean custom that the father exercised control over the land by virtue of his senior position although the paper title was held in his son. Further, the court took notice of family agreements which were encouraged by the Japanese administration.
Here, Eliken Eliam was not a member of the Eldridge family. Eliken was a friend of Lincoln Eldridge, the administrator, and was considered "family," however, he was not a member of the family to whom Lincoln could divest Lonet's land.
As indicated in Civil Appeal No. 365, the court took notice of the official Japanese survey begun about 1941 and found that there was strong presumption that the determinations made by the Japanese surveyors and registered in Tochi Daicho were correct.
Here, Lincoln, as administrator, had no authority to include in the family agreement a grant of land to someone outside of the family. The action of Lincoln Eldridge was clearly ultra vires. Therefore, the grant of land to Eliken Eliam is declared void on its face. Further, the appellee has no claim under adverse possession because he freely admits he had not gone back on the land since the end of World War II.
Therefore, Tract No. 73966 is declared to be owned by Lonet Eldridge, the original owner of the land. The judgment of the trial court is hereby REVERSED.