PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Magistrates Court of Vanuatu

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Magistrates Court of Vanuatu >> 2025 >> [2025] VUMC 9

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Hamilton v Hanghangkon [2025] VUMC 9; Civil Case 3064 of 2024 (11 July 2025)

IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF
MC/ CIVL
THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU
Case No. 24/ 3064

BETWEEN:


PARKER HAMILTON T/ AS HAMILTON PLUMING AND GAS
Claimant
Bellevue Stage 2, Port Vila
5119512/ 5400985


AND:


HERMON HANGHANGKON
Port Vila
Defendant


Yawha & Associates Barristers and Solicitors
P.O.Box 309, Nambatu Area,
Port Vila, Vanuatu
Defendant’s counsel


Date of hearing: 11 July 2025
Before: Magistrate Toaliu
Appearance: Yawha. D of Yawha & Associates for the defendant
Mr. Hermon Hanghangkon (defendant)
Copy: B. Bill of Bill Bani Tamwata, Barrister & Solicitors for the claimant.


JUDGEMENT


  1. Judgement is hereby entered in favor of the defendant against the claimant.
  2. Today’s trial date was agreed and set in a pre-trial conference held on June 16, 2025, with counsels for both parties in attendance. Both counsels agreed the date was convenient.
  3. When the case was called this morning for trial, the claimant nor his counsel were present. They are represented by Mr. Bill Bani who had filed a notice of beginning to act on November 11, 2024, but has only appeared once in this matter for pre-trial conference on June 16, 2025.
  4. Clearly the claimants have failed to make appearance for trial this morning and Mr. Yawha submitted that the court should proceed under rule 12.9(2) which states:

(2) If a claimant does not attend when the trial starts:

(a) the court may adjourn the proceeding to a date it fixes; or

(b) the court may dismiss the claimant’s claim and give judgment for the defendant; or

(c) the defendant, with permission of the court, may call evidence to establish that he or she is entitled to judgment under a counterclaim against the claimant.


  1. I accept Mr. Yawha’s submission and proceed to enter judgement pursuant to rule 12.9(2)(b) in favor of the defendant. The defendant is aware of today’s trial and yet failed to appear or failed to notify the court of their absence.
  2. The court hereby orders that:
    1. Mr. Hamilton’s claim for and outstanding of 573, 838VT for a plumbing work on a do-and-charge basis is hereby dismissed.
    2. Defendant is entitled to costs, to be agreed upon or taxed.

DATED at Port Vila this 11th Day of July 2025
BY THE COURT


Philip Toaliu
MAGISTRATE


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUMC/2025/9.html