PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of Vanuatu

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Vanuatu >> 2016 >> [2016] VUSC 193

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Estate of the Late Henri Clement Raoul Leroux [2016] VUSC 193; Probate Case 727 of 2016 (7 December 2016)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU

(PROBATE)

PROBATE CASE NO. 727 of 2016

IN THE MATTER of Application for Letters of Administration in the Estate of the late Henri Clement Raoul Leroux

AND IN THE MATTER of Section 2.3 and 2.5 of the Probate and Administration Rules 2003 and Section 6 and 7 of the Queen’s Regulation No.7 of 1972


Date:
Delivered:
29th April, 2016
7th December, 2016
Before:
The Master Cybelle Cenac-Maragh

ORAL JUDGMENT


  1. This is not a full judgment but an oral one. Should reasons be required for purposes of an appeal then the requisite party should inform the Clerk of Court.
  2. That Edna Lew Ratonel was appointed as administrator of the Estate of Clement Heny Raoul Leroux (hereinafter called “the deceased”) on the 4th February, 2014. The daughter of the deceased Manuela Alguet-Leroux applied on the 17th March, 2016 to have the administration revoked and granted to her.
  3. While it is clear that Ms. Leroux is the daughter of the deceased and therefore an heir to his estate under the Queen’s Regulations it did not automatically follow that she should be administrator of the estate of the deceased.
  4. The evidence of Ms. Ratonel in producing certain signed documents by the deceased that he did not wish his daughter to have any dealings with his estate coupled with the fact that I could find no justifiable reason to revoke the administration led the court to maintain the status quo.
  5. While I accept that the administrator failed to give a proper account to Ms. Leroux I do not believe that it was in an effort to frustrate or deny her what was lawfully hers. Ms. Ratonel, essentially being a creditor, having made a loan to the deceased, which remains to be paid by the estate, and assessing that the value of that loan exceeded what made up the estate, she reasonably concluded that the property was due to her.
  6. Based on the sworn statement in support of her application for administration filed in November of 2013 the value of the leasehold title 03/0H71/022 was estimated to be VT31,300,000 based on valuation report of Toka Robinson.
  7. I accept the objection of the Applicant that the interest charged on the loan is excessive due to the fact that it was not agreed in the signed document between Ratonel and the deceased and therefore, while interest is chargeable, it can only be at the amount of 5% per annum.
  8. My order therefore is as follows:
  9. This matter is to come up for status update on the 25th April, 2017 at 9:30 a.m.

DATED at Port Vila this 7th day of December, 2016.


BY THE COURT


................................................

CYBELLE CENAC-MARAGH

MASTER



PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2016/193.html