PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of Vanuatu

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Vanuatu >> 2021 >> [2021] VUSC 327

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

Taucilagi v Patunvanu [2021] VUSC 327; Civil Case 3349 of 2020 (10 December 2021)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF Civil

THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU Case No. 20/3349 SC/CIVL

(Civil Jurisdiction)


BETWEEN: Elenoa Taucilagi

Applicant


AND: Trelly Samuel Patunvanu

Respondent


Date of Hearing: 10 December 2021

Before: Justice V.M. Trief

In Attendance: Applicant – Ms M. Markward

Respondent – no appearance (Mr E. Macreveth)


DECISION AS TO APPLICATION FOR CHILD CUSTODY


  1. The Applicant Elenoa Taucilagi filed Application for Child Custody on 30 March 2021 (the ‘Application’) in relation to the parties’ two children:
    1. Tarau Elvina Patunvanu, DOB: 27 April 2007 (the ‘daughter’); and
    2. Meleo Samuel Patunvanu, DOB 24 November 2008 (the ‘son’).
  2. The hearing of the Application has been adjourned numerous times to give time to the parties to negotiate settlement.
  3. Mrs Markward wrote 2 letters to the Court in November 2021 stating that consent orders could not be agreed and requesting that the Court re-list the matter. Both counsel were aware of today’s listing. There was no appearance for the Respondent Trelly Samuel Patunvanu.
  4. No submissions in response to the Application have ever been filed for Mr Patunvanu. He has had more than ample opportunity to do so.
  5. Mrs Markward stated that there is no opposition to joint custody being granted. I will do so.
  6. Ms Taucilagi by her sworn statement filed on 30 March 2021 evidences that the son was taken unwillingly from her by Mr Patunvanu in December 2020. She has not had access to him since.
  7. The daughter has been estranged from Ms Taucilagi for reasons that are unclear since at least mid-year 2021.
  8. Since the parties’ divorce in October 2020, Mr Patunvanu has had the most access to the children.
  9. It is in the best interests of the children that both parents have access to them and that the children spend time with both their parents. Accordingly I order that Ms Taucilagi is to have acto t to the children by the children spending at least half of each school holiday with her at her residence in Port Vila.
  10. For the reasons given, it is ordered that:
    1. The parties have joint custody of their children:
      1. Tarau Elvina Patunvanu, DOB: 27 April 2007; and
      2. Meleo Samuel Patunvanu, DOB 24 November 2008.
    2. Ms Taucilagi is to have s to t to the children by the children spending at least half of each school holiday with her at her residence in Port Vila.

DATED at Port Vila t0th day of DecemDecember 2021

BY THE COURT


.................................................

Justice V.M. Trief


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2021/327.html