PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Fiji Law Reports

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Fiji Law Reports >> 1970 >> [1970] FJLawRp 15

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Motibhai & Company Ltd v Hargovind [1970] FJLawRp 15; [1970] 16 FLR 67 (17 July 1970)

[1970] 16 FLR 67


SUPREME COURT


Appellate Jurisdiction


MOTIBHAI & COMPANY LTD.


v


SHANTILAL HARGOVIND AND OTHERS


Knox-Mawer P.J.


4th March, 17th July, 1970


Land — agreement to lease floor of building on land subject to the land transfer system — re-entry by lessors for breach of covenant — necessity of giving notice under section 50 (1) of Land (Transfer and Registration) Ordinance — Real Property Act 1900 (New South Wales) s.3(a) — Land (Transfer and Registration) Ordinance (Cap. 136-1955) ss.2, 50(1), 50(5)(a).

Landlord and tenant — land subject to the Land (Transfer and Registration) Ordinance (Cap. 136-1955) — agreement to lease ground floor of building thereon — applicability of section 50(1) of Ordinance.

Lessors brought an action in the Magistrate's Court for possession of premises comprising the ground floor of a building on land subject to the Land (Transfer and Registration) Ordinance, on the ground that the lessees had broken two of the covenants of their agreement to lease. The Magistrate found that the covenants in question had been broken but dismissed the action because the lessors had not given the notice required by section 50 (1) of that Ordinance. On appeal the argument for the lessors was confined to a submission that section 50 (1)[1] did not apply to the agreement in question.

Held: By virtue of the definition of "lease" in section 50(5)(a) of the Ordinance, and of "land" in section 2 thereof, the submission on behalf of the lessors failed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Magistrate's Court.

R. G. Kermode for the appellant company.

D. N. Sahai and A. Katonivualiku for the respondents.

KNOX-MAWER P.J.: [17th July, 1970)

This is an appeal against a decision of the Magistrates' Court of the First Class, Suva, in its civil jurisdiction.

On 16th March, 1962, the appellant entered into the following Agreement with the respondents:

"AGREEMENT made the 16th day of March one thousand nine hundred and sixty-two BETWEEN MOTIBHAI PATEL, PRABHUDAS PATEL and PARSHOTAM PATEL (all sons of Becharbhai Patel) of Ba in the Colony of Fiji, Merchants trading as " Motibhai & Company " (hereinafter called " the Lessors ") of the one part AND SHANTILAL HARGOVIND (fin Hargovind), HARGOVIND DAMODAR (f/n Damodar), MADANLAL HARGOVIND (f/n Hargovind) and HASMUKHLAL HARGOVIND (f/n Hargovind) all of Suva in the Colony of Fiji, trading as " Shantilal Brothers " (hereinafter called "the lessees") of the other part WHEREBY IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:-
  1. The lessors shall grant and the lessees shall accept a lease for a term of 10 (ten) years from the 1st day of April, 1962 at a monthly rental of £27.10.0 (Twenty seven pounds ten shillings) payable in advance on the first day of each and every month during the term of the tenancy hereby created of ALL THAT the Bulk Store measuring 29' x 26' on the ground floor of the building presently occupied by the lessees and comprised in C.T. No. 7981 in Cumming Street in the City of Suva and more particularly described in the rough sketch plan annexed hereto and edged red, on the following covenants, conditions and stipulations —

In the court below, the appellant sought, inter alia, an order for possession (pursuant to the re-entry clause (k) above) upon the ground that the respondents were in breach of covenants (d) and (j) of the Agreement. The learned trial Magistrate found these alleged breaches of covenant established. However, since the appellant has not complied with the provisions of section 50 (l) of the Land (Transfer and Registration) Ordinance, the learned trial Magistrate was constrained to dismiss the suit.

Learned Counsel for the appellant has confined his argument before this Court to the submission that section 50 does not apply to the Agreement set out above.

Section 50(5)(a) of the Ordinance however provides:—

" "lease " includes an original or derivative sublease; also an agreement for a lease where the lessee has become entitled to have his lease granted;"

Moreover in section 2 of the Ordinance "land" is defined:—

" "land" means land, messuages, tenements and hereditaments, corporeal and incorporeal, of every kind and description, or any estate or interest therein, together with all paths, passages, ways, water-courses, liberties, privileges, easements, plantations, gardens, mines, minerals and quarries and all trees and timber thereon or thereunder lying or being unless any such are specially excepted;

This corresponds to the definition of land in section 3 (a) of the New South Wales Real Property Act, 1900. In the Torrens System in New South Wales, (1951), Mr. John Baalman, the learned author comments at page 14:—

"A person can be registered as the proprietor of a stratum of land, whether below the surface as in the case of a mineral-bearing stratum, or above the surface as in the case of a storey of a building.

These then is the short answer to this case, although I have of course given very careful consideration to everything submitted by learned Counsel for the appellant. With respect, I am not persuaded by his argument. In the result this appeal is dismissed, with costs in favour of the respondents.

Appeal dismissed.


[1] Land (Transfer and Registration) Ordinance a. 50 (1):—

" A right of re-entry or forfeiture under any proviso or stipulation in a lease for a breach of any convenant or condition, express or implied, in the lease shall not be enforceable, by action or otherwise, unless and until the lessor serves on the lessee a notice—
and the lessee fails, within a reasonable time thereafter, to remedy the breach, if it is capable of remedy, and to make reasonable compensation in money, to the satisfaction of the lessor, for the breach."


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJLawRp/1970/15.html