PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

National Court of Papua New Guinea

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> National Court of Papua New Guinea >> 1996 >> [1996] PGNC 69

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

Papua New Guinea Law Society v Attorney General [1996] PGNC 69; N1455 (28 June 1996)

N1455


PAPUA NEW GUNEA
[In the National Court of Justice]


OS. 564 of 1995


BETWEEN


THE PAPUA NEW GUINEA LAW SOCIETY
Plaintiff


AND:


SAO GABI as The Attorney General
First Defendant


AND:


ARNOLD MARSIPAL, Minister for Justice
Second Defendant


WAIGANI: Andrew, J
24 April 1996


MADANG: 28 June 1996


Declaratory Orders - Lawyers - Exemption from practising certificate fees for class of lawyers - whether the Papua New Guinea Law Society Practising Certificate Fees (Exemptions) Rules 1995 are ultra vires the Lawyers Act 1986.


Rule making Powers of the Council of the Papua New Guinea Law Society and the Minister for Justice under the Lawyers Act 1986.


ANDREW, J: The plaintiff in this matter proceeded by way of Originating Summons seeking the following declarations:


"1. A declaration that the Papua New Guinea Law Society Practising Certificate Fees (Exemptions) Rules 1995, made by the Minister for Justice as statutory Instrument No. 2 of 1995 and published in the National Gazette No. G. 8 of 1995, issued on 23rd January, 1995 was and is void ab initio.


2. Costs.


3. The time for entry of these orders be abridged to the date which shall take place forthwith.


4. Such further or other orders as the Court deems fit."


The Papua New Guinea Law Society Practicing Certificate Fees (Exemptions) Rules 1995 ("the Rules") were made by the Minister for Justice on the 20th January 1995 in National Gazette No. 8 of 1995. These Rules exempted certain "government lawyers" (meaning a lawyer employed by a governmental body) from the fees payable for a practising certificate referred to in s.39 of the Lawyers Act. That Exemption was for the period 1st January, 1995 to 31st December, 1995.


The Papua New Guinea Law Society now claims that the Minister lacked the authority to make these Rules under the Lawyers Act ('The Act') and that therefore the Rules are ULTRA VIRES the Act.


The Preamble of the Rules states that the instrument is made by the Minister under the Act.


PRACTISING CERTIFICATE RULES


S.39 (2) of the Act provides that practising certificates "shall be issued in the form prescribed by the Rules", while s.42 (2) provides that applications for practising certificates shall be "in the form prescribed by the Rules and accompanied by any fee prescribed by the Rules".


The main provision relating to the making of Rules is s.21 of the Act which provides:


"21. RULES


(1) The Council may make Rules providing for -

(2) Notice of Rules made under Subsection (1) shall be given in the National Gazette by the Minister and the Rules shall come into operation on the gazettal of such notice or on such other date as is specified in the notice.

(3) Until such time as the council has made Rules for the purposes of Subsection (1), the Minister may determine the Rules.

(4) The Rules determined under subsection (3) shall, on the making of Rules under subsection (1), be deemed to have been repealed".

Sections 21 (3) and (4) were introduced by the Lawyers (Amendment) Act 1987, No. 7 of 1987, which came into force on 17th March 1987. This amendment allowed the then Minister for Justice to make the Papua New Guinea Law Society Rules L.S. No. 7 of 1987, which provided for the membership of the society and the election of a President and the Council. After the first council took office, it made the Papua New Guinea Law Society Membership Rules L.S. No. 2 of 1988 and later the Papua New Guinea Law Society Election Rules L.S. No. 6 of 1989. When these Instruments were made the Rules by the Minister in 1987 were repealed by the effect of Section 21 (4) of the Act. It would seem that s.21 (3) and (4) were introduced to enable the law Society to operate. Subsequently the council of the Law Society, exercising its powers under s.21 (1) (g), passed Rules in relation to practising certificates.


Section 21 of the Lawyers Act provides generally for the making of Rules by the Law Society Council. Although there is mention of the making of Rules in relation to the imposition of the annual levy on members, there is no specific mention of rules relating to practising certificate fees. The council has made Rules relating to practising certificates and scales of fees and it is apparent that they have been made under the general rule making powers of the council, namely, Section 21 (1) (g).


The Exemptions Rules 1995, it is conceded, were made by the Minister in accordance with the provisions of Section 21 (3) of the Act. This Subsection which was inserted by No. 7 of 1987 reads:


"21 (3) Until such time as the Counsil has made Rules for the purposes of Subsection (1), the Minister may determine the Rules."


Section 21 (4) provides that when the council has made Rules on the matter, the Minister's Rule is automatically repealed. The Ministers rule making power, it is again conceded, is a transitional one that can only be exercised where the council has not yet exercised it.


I think that the issue is therefore whether any of the Rules made by the Law Society Council in relation to practising certificates are sufficiently comprehensive and exclusive such that they would exclude the Minister from passing the Exemptions Rules 1995, under the provision of S. 21 (3) of the Act.


The Council of the Law Society first made the Papua New Guinea Law Society practising Certificate Rules L. S. No. 4 of 1988. That was repealed by Papua New Guinea Law Society Practising Certificate Rules 1990 - Statutory Instrument L.S. No. 14 of 1990. That provides for:


(a) "Applications for Practising Certificate for the period commencing 1st January and ending 31st December in each year.

(b) Form and issuing of Practising Certificates.

(c) The class of lawyers for the purpose of S. 41 (1) (b) (i) of the Lawyers Act."

The class of lawyers required to make application for practising certificate and the relevant fee to be paid are contained in the instrument. That class of lawyers includes "a lawyer employed by the State or a body established by statute."


It was submitted that these rules do not deal with the issue of the exemption of a class of lawyers from the payment of practising certificate fees and that accordingly the Minister was entitled to make the Exemptions Rules 1995 as a Rule in its own right. In my judgment however I think that that is a fallacious argument. Clearly the Rules of the Council provide unequivocally for a 'government lawyer' to pay the required fee and the Exemptions Rules 1995 are simply in contradistinction and are seeking to amend the Rules. The council has made Rules for the payment of fees for government lawyers and accordingly the Minister could not exercise his power under S. 21 (3) of the Act to make further Rules. I am satisfied that the Papua New Guinea Law Society Practising Fees (Exemptions) Rules 1995 were ultra vires the Lawyers Act 1986.


ORDER


I make the following declaration. That the Papua New Guinea Law Society Practising Certificate Fees (Exemptions) Rules 1995, Statutory Instrument No. 2 of 1995 published in gazette No. G.8 of 1995 and issued in 23rd January 1995 is ULTRA VIRES The Lawyers Act 1986.


Lawyer for the Applicant: Ere Kariko
Lawyer for the Respondent: The Solicitor General


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/pg/cases/PGNC/1996/69.html