You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
Supreme Court of Samoa >>
2016 >>
[2016] WSSC 150
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Police v Tualima [2016] WSSC 150 (19 August 2016)
SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
Police v Tualima [2016] WSSC 150
Case name: | Police v Tualima |
|
|
Citation: | |
|
|
Decision date: | 19 August 2016 |
|
|
Parties: | POLICE v LAUITITI TUALIMA male of Satapuala and Luatuanuu (defendant) |
|
|
Hearing date(s): |
|
|
|
File number(s): | S3402/15, S3446/15, S3447/15,S3452/15, S3453/15, S3454/15, S3523/15 |
|
|
Jurisdiction: | Criminal |
|
|
Place of delivery: | Supreme Court of Samoa, Mulinuu |
|
|
Judge(s): | JUSTICE VAAI |
|
|
On appeal from: |
|
|
|
Order: | - For the offence of rape you are sentenced to 18 years imprisonment.
- For the remaining two offences of sexual violation you are sentenced to 5 years imprisonment on each charge.
- For the offence of robbery you are sentenced to 12 months imprisonment.
- For threatening words and being armed with a dangerous weapon you are convicted and discharged.
- For the offence of burglary you are sentenced to 12 months imprisonment.
- All sentences are to be served concurrently and shall commence at the expiry of the current term.
|
|
|
Representation: | L Su’a-Mailo for prosecution Unrepresented |
|
|
Catchwords: | Rape – sexual violation – robbery – burglary – threatening words and armed with dangerous weapon – history
of criminal offending – aggravating features – imprisonment term |
|
|
Words and phrases: |
|
|
|
Legislation cited: |
|
|
|
Cases cited: | Police v Peti Key |
|
|
Summary of decision: |
|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
HELD AT MULINUU
BETWEEN:
POLICE
Prosecution
AND:
LAUITITI TUALIMA male of Satapuala and Luatunuu
Defendant
Counsel:
L Su’a-Mailo for prosecution
Unrepresented
Sentence: 19 August 2016
S E N T E N C E
Discussion
- At the age of 23 you have accumulated 20 convictions for which you are due for release in 2027. The sentence that the court will
impose today will substantially increase your years of incarceration.
- Your history of criminal offending following your deliberate rejection of the efforts by the court and the probation service to rehabilitate
and steer you away from the path of crime and unlawful conduct is a realistic revelation of your desire to pursue a life of criminal
offending, and to spend most of your life behind bars.
- Originally your offending was confined to burglary and theft but it subsequently upgraded to robbery when you employed the use of
violence and weapons to effect the thefts during your several escapes from prison. As for sexual offending, you have one conviction
for indecent assault in 2011.
- You have relayed to the court your shame and remorse for the harm you have caused to the couple whose room at the hotel you broke
into and sexually violated the woman amongst the other criminal acts you committed. It seems apparent from your plea that despite
your relapse into sin and crime in the past, your criminal conduct can be treated and you are willing and prepared to make a change.
If you are genuine and you are serious about taking steps to seek efforts the court will provide avenues to facilitate your road
to recovery. Parole is one such facility.
- But realistically you pose an ongoing and significant risk to the safety of the community particularly the violence to persons and
to property involved in your conviction history. The risk of re-offending remains very high unless you are kept in confinement within
the prison compound. The same view is echoed in the pre-sentence report from the Probation Service. The report says:
- “Lauititi is on the stage where he sees Tafaigata as his real home. His constant involvement with the law while serving imprisonment
time is an indication of his less sense of remorse, and his facial expression and remarks during interview highlight the fact that
he is expecting to break the law again and again.”
- At the time of this offending you were again on the run from the police. You ability to walk away from a supposedly tight police
security particularly given your history of escapes, speaks volumes of unprofessionalism and neglect on the part of the authorities
concerned.
- When you broke into and entered one of tree houses at Lupesina Resort in the early hours of the morning in question you invaded the
privacy of the couple staying at the resort. You were armed with a pair of scissors. You immediately took advantage of their state
of fear, uncertainty and vulnerability. You threatened to kill when they screamed. When you demanded money they gave you all their
cash as well as their other belongings like head phones, camera and cell phone. And they begged to take them and leave them alone.
- If the purpose of your breaking and entering was to obtain cash for your sustenance during your borrowed free time on the run, you
could have taken the money and other items and run. But you chose not to. You took advantage of the circumstances. You tied the
male partner’s hands and legs while he was lying on his stomach. You then proceeded to sexually violate the female partner
in full view of her partner. After kissing her, you removed her panties, inserted your fingers inside her vagina and into her anus.
You then turned her over and raped her until you ejaculated. You then tied her legs and proceeded to leave the room with the cash
and other items when one of the female workers came on the scene and spoilt you free escape.
- Your offending has had significant mental and psychological impact on both the victims who have since returned to Australia where
they have continued to receive treatments including one for Post-Traumatic Stress disorder. Their sense of personal safety have
been fundamentally changed. Distress, panic, anxiety are some of the symptoms which require both victims to seek medical treatment.
This is particularly true for the female victim because the crime of rape involves a severe degree of emotional and psychological
trauma.
- As for the appropriate punishment to be imposed, the prosecution contended that for the most serious offence of rape, the offending
falls within band 3 of the guidelines for sentencing provided in Peti Key v Police which provides for a custodial sentence of 14 – 20 years. And given the aggravating features of the offending the prosecution
is seeking a starting point at the highest level which is 20 years. For the remaining offences a much reduced level of sentences
are sought.
- In considering the appropriate starting point of sentence, the court must also consider sentences imposed in the past by this court
for similar offending. Those cases provide a useful guidance, but the sentence for each case must be determined by the circumstances
of the particular case.
- The aggravating features of the offending warrants a starting point of 18 years for the offence of sexual violation by rape. For
your previous conviction history your sentence is upgraded by 3 years making a total of 21 years. In mitigating, I accept submission
by the prosecution that your guilty plea is the only mitigation factor. It was nonetheless a delayed guilty plea. A deduction of
3 years is made. For the offence of rape you are sentenced to 18 years imprisonment.
- For the remaining two offences of sexual violation you are sentenced to 5 years imprisonment on each charge.
- For the offence of robbery you are sentenced to 12 months imprisonment and for threatening words and being armed with a dangerous
weapon you are convicted and discharged.
- As for the offence of burglary, the Lupesina Tree Resort and Mr Batchelor have been added to your extensive list of victims for your
multiple offendings of breaking and entering. Mr Batchelor has through the medical publicised his concerns and frustrations as a
victim of your offending and as a victim of the neglect of the prison authorities. The Court shares his frustrations and concerns.
For the offence of burglary you are sentenced to 12 months imprisonment.
- All sentences are to be served concurrently and shall commence at the expiry of the current terms.
JUSTICE VAAI
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/ws/cases/WSSC/2016/150.html