PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of Samoa

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Samoa >> 2025 >> [2025] WSSC 3

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

Police v Torres [2025] WSSC 3 (5 February 2025)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
Police v Torres [2025] WSSC 3 (5 February 2025)


Case name:
Police v Torres


Citation:


Decision date:
5 February 2025


Parties:
POLICE (Informant) and ARIANNE FAE TIMBLIQUE TORRES, female of Philippines, Nu’uuli American Samoa and Matautu (Defendant)


Hearing date(s):



File number(s):



Jurisdiction:
Supreme Court – CRIMINAL


Place of delivery:
Supreme Court of Samoa, Mulinuu


Judge(s):
Senior Justice Nelson


On appeal from:



Order:



Representation:
L. Taimalelagi-Strickland for Prosecution
Q. Sauaga for the Defendant


Catchwords:
Possession of narcotics – methamphetamine – possession of unlawful ammunition – monetary penalty.


Words and phrases:



Legislation cited:


Cases cited:
Police v Afamasaga [2018] WSSC 118.


Summary of decision:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
HELD AT MULINUU


BETWEEN:


P O L I C E


Informant


A N D:


ARIANNE FAE TIMBLIQUE TORRES, female of Philippines, Nu’uuli American Samoa and Matautu.


Defendant


Counsel: L. Taimalelagi-Strickland for prosecution
Q. Sauaga for the defendant


Sentence: 05 February 2025


SENTENCE

  1. The defendant has pleaded guilty to two (2) charges. Firstly that at Faleolo International Airport on 6th July 2024 she had in her possession four small clear plastic bags containing methamphetamine weighing 0.83 grams contrary to the Narcotics Act 1967. The second charge is that same date same place same time she was found in possession of one unlawful ammunition namely a 44 Remington bullet not being authorised to possess said ammunition and contrary to the Arms Ordinance 1960.
  2. The Police Summary of Facts has been accepted by the defendant through her lawyer and states:
  3. The defendant from what I have read is she is a well-educated young lady and Madame it is beyond me how you thought taking a metal bullet through the airport security scanner would escape detection. The bullet was well concealed in a special pocket in the back of your backpack. It was difficult to detect and the security officers had to scan your bag three times before these prohibited substances were located.
  4. There is no evidence before the court supporting your assertion that you were ignorant of the contents of your backpack thus the court does not accept that. But the court does accept the submission of both your lawyer and counsel for the State and Police that a non-custodial penalty is appropriate for your case. You were smuggling these out as opposed to importation. Also because of the very small quantity of narcotics involved of less than 1 gram and also because you have pleaded guilty to the charge and avoided wasting the courts time, your clean record and your obvious remorse at your behaviour in this matter. So we will not be sending you to jail today.
  5. But the quantum of the fine that the court will impose Ms Torres needs to hold you accountable for what you did and must continue to send a strong clear message to every one of the seriousness of what you did and how this kind of behaviour will not be tolerated in this country. The security officers at Faleolo Airport are to be indeed commended for their vigilance in detecting this matter.
  6. I propose to follow the approach taken by this court in Police v Afamasaga [2018] WSSC 118. And in doing so impose the following monetary penalties: firstly for possession of less than 1 gram of methamphetamine you will be convicted and fined $2,000.00. In addition, you will pay Prosecution costs of $500.00, Probation Service costs of $200.00 and Court costs of $300.00. As agreed upon by counsels, that $3,000.00 has to be paid within four (4) weeks of todays date. If it is not, then you will serve 6 months in prison.
  7. In relation to the second charge of possession of a 44 caliber bullet you will be convicted and fined $500.00. You will also pay Prosecutions costs of $300.00, Probation Service costs of $100.00, Court costs of $100.00, that is an extra $1,000.00 also payable within four (4) weeks as agreed by counsel, in default of payment you will serve 3 months in prison.
  8. So what this amounts to is the $4,000.00 must be paid within 4 weeks or beforehand, in default of payment you will serve 9 months imprisonment.
  9. Of course you will have to remain in country pending payment of these funds and your travel documents will continue to be held by the Registrar of the Court until the monetary payments are made. But once the payments are made it is the recommendation of this court that your entry visa be cancelled by the Samoa Immigration Authorities and that you immediately be required to leave Samoa on the first available flight. Once it is paid you are gone. And if you are allowed back into this country and you come before this court on anything like this in future, be assured you will be looking at something completely different from monetary fines. Are we clear on that? (Defendant: Yes)

SENIOR JUSTICE NELSON



PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/ws/cases/WSSC/2025/3.html